MAYA DEVI RAWAT v. U.O.I. THRU. SECY. MINISTRY OF EXTERNAL AFFAIRS PATIYALA HAOUSE NEW DELHI AND 3 OTHERS
WRIC/7952/2025 · 2025-08-20
Brij Raj Singh, Sangeeta Chandra
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 158485 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 158485 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:48662-DB Court No. - 2 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 7952 of 2025 Petitioner :- Maya Devi Rawat Respondent :- U.O.I. Thru. Secy. Ministry Of External Affairs Patiyala Haouse New Delhi And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Amarjeet Singh,Umesh Singh Counsel for Respondent :- A.S.G.I.,C.S.C. Hon'ble Mrs. Sangeeta Chandra,J. Hon'ble Brij Raj Singh,J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the State Respondents and Sri Varun Pandey,
learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent nos.1 and 2.
2. This petition has been filed with the following main prayer:-
"issue, a writ order or direction in the nature of Mandamus thereby commanding and directing to respondents to issue passport in favour of petitioner for the purpose of participating of her minor son namely Divyansu Singh in motor sports training at abroad Dubai/ Malaysia."
3. It is the case of the petitioner that she had applied for Passport for the purpose of participation of her son in Motor Sports Training at Dubai/ Malaysia. The application of the petitioner was received in the office of 31.01.2024 but an adverse Police Verification Report has been submitted by the Police Station Bilgram, Hardoi, saying that Case Crime No.0160 of 2023 under Sections 406, 420, 504 and 506 of the I.P.C. is pending.
4. It has been submitted that the Investigating Officer has submitted a Final Report No. 56 of 2023 on 15.08.2023 before the Magistrate concerned, yet the respondents are not issuing the Passport.
5. There are no pleadings on record to show that after submission of the Final Report, the Magistrate concerned has passed an order thereon.
6. We do not find any merit in the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner.
7. The writ petition stands dismissed.
Order Date :- 20.8.2025 Rahul Digitally signed by :- RAHUL TRIPATHI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench