Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 15847 (RAJ)

PANKAJ KUMAR SHARMA AND ORS v. STATECOP SOCIETY DEPANR

CW/5972/2012 · 2025-05-09

Sudesh Bansal

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:19632] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 5972/2012 1. Pankaj Kumar Sharma S/o Shri Mawasi Ram Sharma, aged about 31 years, Resident of Village Sirsai, Tehsil Nadbai, District Bharatpur (Raj.) 2. Satish Kumar Sharma S/o Shri Dwarka Prasad, aged about 43 years, Resident of Village Brahmpura, Post Tassai, Tehsil Kathumar, Distt. Alwar (Raj.) 3. Sawan Kumar Kankhedaya S/o. Shri Kastoor Chand Kankhedaya, aged about 25 years, Resident of 1/181-23, Ambedkar Nagar, Dausa (Raj.) 4. Hemant Bairwa S/o. Shri Ram Prasad Bairwa, aged about 36 years, Resident of 19, Vikas Colony, Dausa (Raj.) 5. Anil Kumar Yadav S/o. Shri Ishwar Singh Yadav, aged about 24 years, Resident of Village Binoliya, Post Jadiya, Tehsil Tijara, Distt. Alwar (Raj.) 6. Jitendra Kumar Sharma S/o. Shri Om Prakash Sharma, aged about 31 years, Resident of Village and Post Lalsot, Distt. Dausa (Raj.) 7. Hetram Yadav S/o. Shri Phool Singh Yadav, aged about 31 years, Resident of Village and Post Bandhrol, Tehsil Thanagazi, Distt. Alwar (Raj.) 8. Babu lal Kasana S/o. Shri Chittarmal Kasana, aged about 31 years, Resident of Kalyanpura Khurd, Tehsil Kotputli, Distt. Jaipur (Raj.) ----Petitioner Versus 1.State of Rajasthan through Joint Registrar (Consumer Cooperative Societies, Rajasthan, Jaipur 2. General Manager, Alwar Sehkari Upbhokta, Wholesale Bhandar Ltd. Alwar (Raj.) ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Manish Kumar Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Padam Singh Gurjar, AGC [2025:RJ-JP:19632] (2 of 2) [CW-5972/2012] HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL Order 09/05/2025 1. Instant writ petition has been filed by and on behalf of petitioners jointly, seeking appointment on the post of Pharmacist pursuant to Recruitment- 2012. 2. Counsel for petitioners, having instructions from petitioners, submits that in the subsequent vacancies, petitioners have been shortlisted in the final merit list for the post of Pharmacist, in such view, petitioners are not interested to pursue the writ petition. 3. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as not press. 4. Stay application and other pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of. (SUDESH BANSAL),J NITIN /239