- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:25444 RP No. 48 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF JULY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH REVIEW PETITION NO.48 OF 2024 IN M.F.A.NO.8736/2022 (CPC) BETWEEN: 1. MANJULA W/O LATE K.C.RAVINDRA KUMAR, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, R/AT NO.2223, 15TH ‘B’ CROSS, 21ST ‘A’ MAIN, 1ST SECTOR, HSR LAYOUT, BENGALURU-560102. 2. KUM. NAYANA D/O LATE K.C.RAVINDRA KUMAR, AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS, R/AT NO.2223, 15TH ‘B’ CROSS, 21ST ‘A’ MAIN, 1ST SECTOR, HSR LAYOUT, BENGALURU-560102. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. AJITH A. SHETTY, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. M/S. FRONTIER SHELTERS PVT. LTD., HAVING REGISTERED OFFICE AT NO.422, II FLOOR, 80 FEET ROAD, 6TH BLOCK, KORAMANGALA, BENGALURU-560095 REP. BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, MR.C. ANAND. Digitally signed by DEVIKA M Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:25444 RP No. 48 of 2024 2. SRI. K.C.MURALI KRISHNA S/O LATE K.C. MURALI KRISHNA, SINCE DECEASED BY HIS LR. PRATHIMA M.K. W/O LATE K.C.MURALI KRISHNA, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, R/AT NO.581/D, 6TH F CROSS, 6TH BLOCK, KORAMANGALA, BENGALURU-560095 3. SRI. C. ANAND S/O LATE K.R.CHINNAPPA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS, R/AT NO.183, 18TH A MAIN ROAD, 6TH BLOCK, KORAMANAGALA BENGALURU-560095. 4. MRS. THANUJA W/O MR. C. ANAND, AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS, R/AT NO.183, 18TH A MAIN ROAD, 6TH BLOCK, KORAMANGALA, BENGALURU-560095. 5. PRUTHVI A., S/O MR. C. ANAND, AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS, R/AT NO.183, 18TH MAIN ROAD, 6TH BLOCK, KORAMANGALA, BENGALURU-560095. 6. YASHAS A., S/O MR. C ANAND , AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS, R/AT NO.183, 18TH MAIN ROAD, 6TH BLOCK, KORAMANGALA, BENGALURU-560095. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:25444 RP No. 48 of 2024 7. K.C.KOMALA D/O LATE K.T.CHINNAPPA REDDY, W/O MR. N. RAJENDRA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, R/AT NO.637, 1/3, 80 FEET ROAD, 8TH BLOCK, K.R. GARDEN, KORAMANGALA, BENGALURU-560059. 8. MR. PRASHANTH S/O RAJENDRA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS, R/AT NO.637 1/3, 80 FEET ROAD, 8TH BLOCK, K.R. GARDEN, KORAMANGALA , BENGALURU-560059. 9. K.C. SHOBHA D/O LATE K.T. CHINNAPPA REDDY, W/O N. RAJESH REDDY, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, R/AT NO.62, GARDEN LAYOUT, II SECTOR HSR LAYOUT, BENGALURU-560102. 10. MR. R. PRATHISH REDDY S/O MR. N. RAJESH REDDY, AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS, R/AT NO.62, GARDEN LAYOUT, II SECTOR HSR LAYOUT, BENGALURU-560102 11. MASTER SACHITH M.K. S/O LATE K.C.MURALI KRISHNAS, AGED ABOUT 16 YEARS, SINCE MINOR, REP. BY HIS NATURAL GUARDIAN AND MOTHER – SMT. PRATHIMA M.K. R/AT 581/D, 6TH F CROSS, 6TH BLOCK, KORAMANGALA, BENGALURU-560095. - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:25444 RP No. 48 of 2024 12. MR. NITHIN M.K. S/O K.C. MURALI KRISHNA, AGED ABOUT 23 YEARS, R/AT NO.581/D, 1ST FLOOR, 6TH F CROSS, 6TH BLOCK, KORAMANGALA, BENGALURU-560095. 13. MS. BASHITHA SOMASHEKHAR D/O LATE SOMASHEKHAR VADDE, AGED : MAJOR, AT FLAT NO.4012, 1ST FLOOR, WING/BLOCK IV FROTIER HEIGHTS APARTMENT, VARTHUR HOBLI-2 HARALUR VILLAGE, BENGALURU-560037. 14. KUM. TEJAL SOMASHEKHAR D/O LATE SOMASHEKHAR, BEING MINOR, REP. BY HER LEGAL GUARDIAN DR. SAI THULASI LAKSHMI CHEMBETI, AT FLAT NO.3014, 1ST FLOOR, WING/BLOCK IV FRONTIER HEIGHTS APARTMENTS VARTHUR HOBLI-2, HARALUR VILLAGE, BENGALURU-560037. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. MANASA B. RAO, ADVOCATE FOR R1, R3 TO R6; SRI. B.L.TEJAS, ADVOCATE FOR R12; NOTICE TO R7 AND R8 SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED; NOTICE TO R9 TO R11, R13 AND R4 DISPENSED WITH VIDE ORDER DATED 16.10.2024; NOTICE TO R2 IS DISPENSED WITH VIDE ORDER DATED 02.12.2024; NOTICE TO R1 IS HELD SUFFICIENT VIDE ORDER DATED 28.02.2025) - 5 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:25444 RP No. 48 of 2024 THIS REVIEW PETITION IS FILED UNDER ORDER SECTION 114 AND ORDER 47 RULE 1 OF CPC, PRAYING TO REVIEW OF THE ORDER DATED 11.08.2023, PASSED BY THIS HON’BLE COURT IN MFA NO.8736/2022 AS PER ANNEXURE-A, TO THE LIMITED EXTENT OF MENTIONED THE DESCRIPTION OF THOSE UNITS/FLATS WHICH ARE TO BE PRESERVED TILL DISPOSAL OF THE ORIGINAL PROCEEDINGS AND TO MENTIONED THE DESCRIPTION OF THOSE UNITS/FLATS WHICH CAN BE SOLE BY THE APPELLANTS IN THE SAID APPEALS. THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH ORAL ORDER The learned counsel for the respondents filed memo stating that list is given undertaking that they are not going to dispose of the flats which are mentioned in the list. 2. The counsel for petitioner sought to review the order only on the ground that specific details are not given. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he also given list and now petitioner’s counsel submits that he is agreed for the list given by the respondents’ counsel along with the memo. Accordingly, review petition - 6 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:25444 RP No. 48 of 2024 is disposed of in view of the undertaking given in the memo. Sd/- (H.P.SANDESH) JUDGE RHS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 3