Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 158463 (ALL)

ARVIND KUMAR v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO.

NABAIL/1048/2025 · 2025-08-19

Subhash Vidyarthi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:48389 Court No. - 13 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 1048 of 2025 Applicant :- Arvind Kumar Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. Counsel for Applicant :- Ramakar Shukla Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Subhash Vidyarthi,J. 1. Heard Sri Ramakar Shukla, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the applicant as well as Sri Ayush Shukla, the learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the State. 2. The instant application has been filed by the applicant seeking anticipatory bail in F.I.R./Case Crime No.96 of 2025 under Sections 319(2), 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2) B.N.S. registered at Police Station- Pisawan, District- Sitapur. 3. The aforesaid case has been registered on the basis of an F.I.R. lodged on 18.03.2025 stating that the applicant had secured appointment on the post of Assistant Teacher in Primary School on the basis of B.L.Ed. degree purportedly obtained in the year 2014 but upon verification, it was found to be fake. 5. In the affidavit filed in support of the anticipatory bail application it has been stated that the applicant is innocent having no criminal history and he has been falsely been implicated in the present case. 6. The learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that the applicant had joined the post on 01.07.2024 and his services have already been terminated by means of an order dated 03.03.2025. 7. Learned State Counsel has opposed the bail application and he has submitted that the investigation in the present case is still pending. 8. Learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that the applicant will co-operate in the proceedings of the case. 9. Having considered the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, I am of the view that the aforesaid facts are sufficient for making out a case for granting anticipatory bail to the applicant. 10. In view of the above, the anticipatory bail application of the applicants is allowed. In the event of arrest/ appearance of applicant before the learned Trial Court in the aforesaid case crime, he shall be released on anticipatory bail on his furnishing personal bond and two solvent sureties, each in the like amount, to the satisfaction of S.H.O./Court concerned on the following conditions and subject to any other conditions that may be fixed by the Trial Court : (i) that the applicant shall make himself/herself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required; (ii) that the applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence; (iii) that the applicant shall not leave India without the previous permission of the court. (iv) that the applicant shall appear before the trial court on each date fixed, unless personal presence is exempted; and (v) that the applicant shall not pressurize/ intimidate the prosecution witness. . (Subhash Vidyarthi, J.) Order Date :- 19.8.2025/-Amit K- Digitally signed by :- AMIT KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench