MOHAMMED MUSTAQUEEM ANSARI v. ANSARI AYESHA TABASSUM @ NAGMA
WP/732/2024 · 2025-05-07
Shri Y G Khobragade
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 15846 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 15846 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
922wp732-24 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 922 CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 732 OF 2024 Mohammed Mustaqueem Ansari VERSUS Ansari Ayesha Tabassum @ Nagma ... Mr. Shaikh Wajeed Ahmed, Advocate for the Petitioner Mr. Lalit M. Badgujar h/for Mr. Swapnil Deshmukh, Advocate for Respondent CORAM : Y. G. KHOBRAGADE, J. Dated : 7th May, 2025 PER COURT :-
1. Mr. Shakh Wajeed Ahmed, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr. Lalit Badgujar, the learned counsel appearing for the respondent jointly submitted that the parties to the present petition have amicably settled the dispute before the learned Family Court, therefore, the cause of action does not survive.
2. In view of the above, the writ petition is disposed off as infructuous.
( Y. G. KHOBRAGADE, J. ) JPChavan 1 of 1