Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 158458 (ALL)

NEHA TRIPATHI v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. BASIC EDUCATION AND 3 OTHERS

WRIA/9355/2025 · 2025-08-21

Abdul Moin

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:49167 Court No. - 4 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 9355 of 2025 Petitioner :- Neha Tripathi Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Basic Education And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Avneesh Singh,Nagarjun Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Ran Vijay Singh Hon'ble Abdul Moin,J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Rajiv Singh, learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents no. 1 and 2 and Sri Gaurav Joshi, Advocate holding brief of Sri Ran Vijay Singh, learned counsel appearing for the respondent no.3 and 4. With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the instant writ petition is being finally decided. Instant writ petition has been filed by the petitioner claiming that on account of illness with which she is suffering, the details of which have been indicated in paragraph 5 of the writ petition and medical prescriptions of which have been annexed as annexure 1 to the writ petition, the petitioner wants her transfer/adjustment as an Assistant Teacher near to her residence in Pratapgarh. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that with regard to the relief sought in the writ petition, the petitioner may be permitted to submit a representation before the respondent No.3 which may be directed to be decided within a fixed time frame to which Sri Rajiv Singh, learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents no. 1 and 2 and Sri Gaurav Joshi, Advocate holding brief of Sri Ran Vijay Singh, learned counsel appearing for the respondent no.3 and 4 have no objection. In view of the above, it is provided that in case the petitioner submits a representation within ten days from today before the respondent No.3 then the respondent No.3 shall endevour to decide the same by means of a reasoned and speaking order within a further period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order along with representation. With the aforesaid direction, writ petition is disposed of. It is made clear that this Court has not gone into the merits of the case. Order Date :- 21.8.2025/Pachhere/- Digitally signed by :- SATYENDRA SINGH PACHHERE High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench