APHC010204932025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3329] MONDAY ,THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 12810/2025 Between: Vegunta Rama Krishna ...PETITIONER AND The State Of Ap and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. PETLURI NAGA RAJU Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: 2 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 12810/2025 ORDER: This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of the India seeking the following reliefs:- “to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of 4th respondent in not considering petitioner’s representation dated 18.12.2023 submitted for deletion of entries in all web land record of rights in respect of petitioner’s land in an extent of Ac.1.00 Cents in Sy.No.371-2 of Dharmajigudem Village, Lingapalem Mandal, Eluru District in the name of Respondent No.5 for (Khata No.2177) based on a fraudulent document created under a Void document and to place under disputed properties in view of Suit in O.S.No.123/2020 pending before the Honble Court of Junior Civil Judge-Cum-Judicial First Class Magistrate, Chintalapudi as illegal, irregular, irrational, amounts to non- discharge of legal obligation conferred on 4th respondent and violative of the provisions of Andhra Pradesh Rights in Land and Pattadar Pass Books Act, 1971 and rules framed there under and offends Articles 14 and 21 of Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents particularly 4th respondent to rectify the wrongly recorded name with respect to the said lands and pass such other order.” 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Assistant Government Pleader for the respondents. 3. Though the petitioner made several allegations against the respondents, during hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner requested this Court, without touching the merits of the case, to issue a direction to the respondents to dispose of the representation dated 18.12.2023 filed by the petitioner. 3 4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue readily agreed to dispose of the representation dated 18.12.2023, if any pending with the respondents. 5. In view of the submission of the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue, this Court need not decide the truth or otherwise of the allegations made in the petition. This Court is conscious that no such direction be issued, in view of the judgment of the Apex Court in “The Government of India v. P.Venkatesh1”, wherein the Apex Court held that such orders may make for a quick or easy disposal of cases in overburdened adjudicatory institutions. But, they do not serve to the cause of justice. As the learned counsel for the petitioner himself requested to issue a direction to dispose of the representation dated 18.12.2023, this Court find no other alternative except to issue such direction. 6. In the result, the Writ Petition is disposed of, directing the respondents to consider and dispose of the representation dated 18.12.2023 filed by the petitioner, after providing opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned, within a period of two(2) months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. There shall be no order as to costs. 1 2019 (8) SCALE 544 4 As a sequel miscellaneous application, pending, if any, shall also stand closed. ________________________________ VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA, J 16.06.2025 TTPPSS 5 73 HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 12810/2025 16.06.2025 TTPPSS