HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 7615 of 2025 Court No. - 9 HON'BLE RAJESH SINGH CHAUHAN, J. HON'BLE SYED QAMAR HASAN RIZVI, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Arun Kumar Pandey, learned Additional Government Advocate for the State. 2. In view of the proposed order, notices to opposite party Nos 4 & .5 are hereby dispensed with. 3. By means of this writ petition, the petitioner has prayed for the following relief:- "(1) to issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the opposite parties not to harass the petitioner and her family members." 4. Learned Additional Government Advocate has provided the instructions letter dated 11.09.2025 provided by Sri Santosh Kumar Yadav, Sub- Inspector, Police Station-Manikpur, District-Pratapgarh addressing to the learned Government Advocate, High Court, Lucknow, which is taken on record. 5. At the very outset, Sri Pandey, learned Additional Government Advocate has informed the Court, on the basis of instructions, that the instant writ petition has been filed having ulterior motive and extraneous design in her mind inasmuch as the petitioner herself is not cooperating in the investigation and had earlier filed one writ petition bearing Criminal Misc. Writ Petition No.18917 of 2020; Sushma Devi vs. State of U.P. & others, which was dismissed being withdrawn vide order dated 23.03.2022. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Manoj Kumar Misra Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. Sushma Devi @ Sushma Mishra .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Director General Of Police Lko. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) 6. Sri Pandey has also informed that against the brother-in-law (Devar) and sister-in-law (Devarani) of the petitioner, there are serious allegations and so as to make investigation her cooperation is required, but she is not being harassed unnecessarily. 7. In the wake of the aforesaid development, we do not find it appropriate to keep this petition pending and longer. Therefore, the writ petition is disposed of finally having expectation from the petitioner that she shall cooperate in the investigation properly, if any, wherein her cooperation is required, and at the same time the police may not harass the petitioner unnecessarily. September 11,2025 Suresh/ CRLP No. 7615 of 2025 2 (Syed Qamar Hasan Rizvi,J.) (Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J.) Digitally signed by :- SURESH CHANDRA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench