Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 158411 (ALL)

SHAHBAZ KHAN @ AMAN AND OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY./ADDL. CHEIF SECY. HOME LKO. AND OTHERS

CRLP/7559/2025 · 2025-08-21

Rajeev Singh, Rajnish Kumar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:49026-DB Court No. - 10 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 7559 of 2025 Petitioner :- Shahbaz Khan @ Aman And Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy./Addl. Cheif Secy. Home Lko. And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Praveen Kumar Yadav,Atul Krishna,Rishabh Chauhan Counsel for Respondent :- G.A. Hon'ble Rajnish Kumar,J. Hon'ble Rajeev Singh,J. 1. Heard. 2. The instant writ petition is filed by the petitioners with the following prayers:- "(i) To issue a writ, order, or direction in the nature of Certiorari quashing the impugned first information report, registered against the Petitioner by Respondent no. 4, as as Case Crime No. 318 of 2024, under sections 115(2), 191(2), 316(2) 318(4), 352, 351(3) BNS Police Station Bangarmau, District Unnao on 24.08.2024, contained in Annexure no. 1 to the writ petition; (ii) to issue a writ, order, or direction in the nature of Mandamus, commanding the Respondents not to proceed, prosecute, or arrest the Petitioners on the basis of the impugned FIR registered against the Petitioners by Respondent no. 4 as Case Crime No. 318 of 2024, under sections 115(2), 191(2), 316(2) 318(4), 352, 351(3) BNS Police Station Bangarmau, District Unnao on 24.08.2024, contained in Annexure no. 1 to the writ petition." 3. Learned A.G.A. has placed written instructions duly signed by Mr. Satish Dwivedi, Sub Inspector, Police Station- Bangarmau, District- Unnao, which are taken on record. 2 4. The instructions are extracted hereinbelow:- 3 5. Learned A.G.A., on the basis of the instructions, submits that the final report no. 76/25 dated 27.06.2025 has been prepared and forwarded after conclusion of the investigation in the matter, thus, this petition is not maintainable, which could not be disputed by learned counsel for the petitioners. 6. In view of above, since the final report has already been submitted, no case is made out. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed. Order Date :- 21.8.2025 Arpan Digitally signed by :- ARPAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench