Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1 / 3
2025:CGHC:19283
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 2287 of 2025 1 Pooran Lal Parte S/o Bare Lal Parte Aged About 63 Years R/o Subhash Nagar Ward No. 13 Dornapal Tah. Konta Distt Sukuma C.G. 2 Chandu Ram S/o Tedagu Ram Aged About 64 Years R/o Vill Kamaram Post Jagargunda Distt Sukuma C.G. 3 Ful Singh S/o Virnath Aged About 67 Years R/o Vill And Post Pakela Bhandari Para Distt Sukuma C.G.
... Petitioner(s) versus 1 State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Public Works Department Mahanadi Bhawan Mantralaya, New Raipur, Atal Nagar District Raipur (C.G.) 2 The Engineer In Chief Public Works Department, District Raipur (C.G.) 3 The Chief Engineer (Administration) Public Works Department, District Raipur (C.G.) 4 The Chief Engineer Public Works Department, (Bh/sa) Jagdalpur Distt. Bastar C.G. JYOTI SHARMA Digitally signed by JYOTI SHARMA Date: 2025.04.30 11:32:15 +0530
2 / 3 5 The Superintendent Engineer Public Works Department, (Bh/sa) Jagdalpur Distt. Bastar C.G. 6 The Executive Engineer Public Works Department, (Bh/sa) Sukuma Division, Distt. Sukuma C.G. 7 Divisional Joint Director, Treasury Account And Pension Bastar Division Jagdalpur Distt. Bastar C.G.
... Respondent(s) (Cause title is taken from Case Information System) For Petitioners : Mr. Vikash Shrivastava, Advocate For Respondents/ State : Mr. Akhilesh Kumar, G.A.
(HON’BLE SHRI JUSTICE BIBHU DATTA GURU) Order on Board 29/04/2025
1. By the present writ petition, the petitioners are seeking for issuance of an appropriate direction to the Respondent authorities for considering the claims of the Petitioner for grant of leave encashment in terms of the provisions of the Chhattisgarh Work- Charged/Contingency Paid Employees Leave Rules, 1977. 2. According to the Petitioner, they have made their respective claim in the light of the recent decision passed by this Court rendered in W.P.(S) No.3870/2021 (Faguvaram Patel & Others Vs. State of Chhattisgarh & Others) decided on 30.9.2022, wherein similar claim of the Petitioner therein has been allowed. The said decision also stands affirmed by the Division Bench in W.A.
3 / 3 No.119/2023, decided on 20.6.2023. 3. Given the said facts, the present Writ Petition is disposed of at this juncture, directing the Respondent Authorities to immediately process the claims of all similarly placed persons herein in the light of the aforesaid decision passed by this Court on the same subject-matter, within an outer limit of 120 days from the date of receipt of a copy of this Order.
4. With the aforesaid direction, the Writ Petition stands disposed of. Sd/- (BIBHU DATTA GURU)
JUDGE Jyoti