Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010203502018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] TUESDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION No. 8867/2018 Between: Dr.N.B.L.Prasad ...PETITIONER AND The Vice Chancellor and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. A RAMAKRISHNA Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. T K RAGHAVAN(S C FOR JNTU ANATPR)
The Court made the following:
ORDER:
The instant Writ Petition is filed by the Petitioner seeking indulgence of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the following relief:
“.... to issue Writ Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the Letter vide Proceedings No.C3/JNTUA/Estt/NBL/WPMP No 24690/ 2017/ 2018 dated 06.03.2018 which is against Articles 14. 16 and 19 of the Constitution of India and against the rules vide University Order No.670/93 dated 11.08.1993 as illegal and consequently, direct the respondents to promote the petitioner to the post of Director JNTUA OTPRI Ananthapuramu.”
2. The earlier Docket Proceedings would show that none represented for the Petitioner and the matter was directed to be listed today under the caption
“For Dismissal”.
3. Despite the matter being listed under the caption “For dismissal”, none represented for the Petitioner today.
4. Sri T.K.Raghavan, learned Standing Counsel for the respondent- University is in attendance.
2
5. In that view, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No
order as to costs. Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed.
DR.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Mjl/*
3
HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
Writ Petition No. 8867 of 2018
25.03.2025
Mjl /*