Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 158409 (ALL)

NAZIYA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME CIVIL SECTT. LKO.

BAIL/7728/2025 · 2025-08-20

Subhash Vidyarthi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:48739 Court No. - 13 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 7728 of 2025 Applicant :- Naziya Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Civil Sectt. Lko. Counsel for Applicant :- Ranjeet Pratap Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Subhash Vidyarthi,J. 1. Heard Sri Ranjeet Pratap Singh, the learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Prashant Tripathi, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the records. 2. The instant application has been filed seeking release of the applicant on bail in Case Crime No.31 of 2025, under Sections 2/3 of Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and Antisocial Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, registered at Police Station Kotwali Dehat, District Pratapgarh. 3. The gang chart mentions involvement of the applicant in a solitary case, in which he has been granted bail. The applicant is not involved in any other case. 4. In the affidavit filed in support of bail application it has been stated that the applicant is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in the present case. It has also been stated in the affidavit filed in support of the bail application that the applicant is neither a leader nor member of any gang. 5. The learned A.G.A. has opposed the prayer for bail but he could not dispute the aforesaid aspects of the matter. 6. Having considered the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and the fact that the applicant has been granted bail in a solitary case and that the applicant is languishing in jail since 24.10.2024 and without making any observation, which may affect the merits of the case, I am of the view that the aforesaid facts are sufficient for making out a case for enlargement of the applicant on bail in the aforesaid crime. 7. Accordingly, this bail application stands allowed. 8. Let the applicant- Naziya be released on bail in the aforesaid case on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of magistrate/court concerned, subject to following conditions:- (i) the applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence; (ii) the applicant shall not pressurize the prosecution witnesses; (iii) the applicant shall appear on each and every date fixed by the trial court, unless his appearance is exempted by the learned trial court. (Subhash Vidyarthi, J.) Order Date :- 20.8.2025 -Amit K- Digitally signed by :- AMIT KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- AMIT KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- AMIT KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench