Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Delhi · body

2025 DAILYLAW 1584 (DEL)

SUNDER MENGHRAJ CHAINANI v. STATE (NCT OF DELHI)

BAIL APPLN./5002/2025 · 2026-02-24

Vikas Mahajan

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

$~1 (Appellate Side) * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + BAIL APPLN. 5002/2025 SUNDER MENGHRAJ CHAINANI .....Petitioner Through: versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) .....Respondent Through: Mr. Maanish M. Choudhary, Adv. for Victim. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS MAHAJAN % 09.03.2026 O R D E R 1. The present application has been filed by the complainant seeking modification of appearance mentioned in judgment dated 24.02.2026. CRL.M.A. 6856/2026 (by complainant under Section 528 BNSS, 2023) 2. Mr. Maanish M. Choudhary, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the complainant submits that the names of the instructing counsels have been wrongly recorded in the judgment. He submits that the correct appearance has been detailed in para 5 of the application. 3. In view of the above, the appearance on behalf of the complainant in judgment dated 24.02.2026 is modified to read as under: “Mr. Vikas Pahwa, Sr. Adv., Mr. Abhimanyu Bhandari, Sr. Adv. and Mr. Nalin Kohli, Sr. Adv. with Major Nirvirkar Singh (Retd.), Mr. Bharat Chugh, Mr. Maanish M. Choudhary, Mr. Jai Allagh, Mr. Abhinav Agrawal, Mr. Shivam, Mr. Anurag, Advs. for Victim.” 4. The application is disposed of. VIKAS MAHAJAN, J MARCH 9, 2026/aj This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 11/03/2026 at 10:05:22