Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 15839 (GAU)

KRISHNA DAS v. RAHUL CHANDRA DAS

Cont.Cas(C)/408/2024 · 2025-03-04

Suman Shyam

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010152382024 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Cont.Cas(C)/408/2024 KRISHNA DAS D/O- LATE KSHITISH CH. DAS, VILL.- RANGABAK PART-I, P.O. AND P.S. KATLICHERRA, DIST. HAILAKANDI, ASSAM, PIN- 788164. VERSUS RAHUL CHANDRA DAS DIRECTOR SOCIAL WELFARE, ASSAM, UZANBAZAR, GUWAHATI-781001. Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. A H ALAMGIR, Advocate for the Respondent : MR. D NATH, O ASSUMI BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUMAN SHYAM ORDER 05.03.2025 Heard Mr. A. H. Alamgir, learned counsel for the petitioner. Alleging wilful disobedience of the order dated 21.02.2024 passed by this Court in WP(C) No.855/2024 this Contempt Case has been filed. By the order dated 21.02.2024 a direction was issued by this Court upon the authorities to consider the representation filed by the petitioner and dispose of the same. Page No.# 2/2 Today when the matter is called up, Ms. P. Baruah, learned counsel appearing for the sole respondent submits that by the order dated 30.08.2024 the representation submitted by the petitioner has been considered and rejected. As such, the order of this Court has been complied with. Mr. Alamgir, learned counsel for the petitioner, on the other hand, submits that since the post in which the petitioner could have been accommodated is still vacant, there is no justifiable ground for the authorities to reject the representation of the petitioner. Mr. Alamgir might be justified in making such submission. However, the said aspect of the matter cannot be gone into in this Contempt Case. Therefore, by granting liberty to the petitioner to avail appropriate legal remedy, this Contempt Case stands closed. JUDGE Comparing Assistant