1 2025:CGHC:15726 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 1664 of 2025 1 - Abhishek Enterprises A Sole Proprietorship Firm Through Tis Proprietor Abhishek Pandey, S/o Late Lal Manohar Pandey, Aged About 50 Years, R/o Ews-I, Vaishali Nagar, Bhilai, District- Durg C.G. ... Petitioner versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Urban Administration And Development, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Atal Nagar, Raipur, District Raipur, C.G. 2 - Municipal Corporation Bhilai Through Its Commissioner, District Durg Chhattisgarh. ... Respondent(s) (Cause-title taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner : Mr. Shobhit Koshta, Advocate For State/Respondent No.1 : Mr. Satish Gupta, Government Advocate For Respondent No.2 : Mr. Pankaj Agrawal, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order In Chamber 03/04/2025 1. Heard Mr. Shobhit Koshta, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. Satish Gupta, Government Advocate for the RAVI SHANKAR MANDAVI Digitally signed by RAVI SHANKAR MANDAVI Date: 2025.04.08 12:44:38 +0530 2 State/respondent No.1 as well as Mr. Pankaj Agrawal, learned counsel for the respondent No.2. 2. The writ petition has been filed only for a direction to the respondents for clearance of all undisputed and admitted dues of the petitioner in respect of the work executed by the petitioner vide work order dated 01.08.2018 arising out of a tender for construction of CC Cement Road in Ward No.5, from Hoziyari Market in Laxmi Nagar to Dhanwantari School. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the respondents also have in fact meanwhile processed the claim of the petitioner, but thereafter there has been no further development so far as releasing of the dues are concerned. He further submits that till date there has been no dispute whatsoever raised by the respondents in respect of the quantity and the quality of the work completed by the petitioner. 4. Learned counsel for the Corporation appearing on advance notice submits that subject to due verification and scrutiny of the claim of the petitioner, appropriate steps shall be taken at the earliest within a period of 60 days. 5. Given the statement made by the counsel for the Corporation, the writ petition at this juncture stands disposed of directing the respondent No.2 to ensure that the admitted undisputed dues of the petitioner in respect of the work executed by the petitioner 3 from the work order dated 01.08.2018 is cleared within an outer limit of 60 days from the date of receipt of the copy of this order. 6. With the aforesaid observation(s) and direction(s), the present petition is disposed of. Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Ravi Mandavi