Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 158370 (ALL)

SATYA PRAKASH v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. ENERGY LKO. AND 3 OTHERS

WRIA/9298/2025 · 2025-08-20

Abdul Moin

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:48720 Court No. - 4 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 9298 of 2025 Petitioner :- Satya Prakash Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Energy Lko. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Avinash Mishra Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Neerav Chitravanshi,Ran Vijay Singh Hon'ble Abdul Moin,J. Heard learned counsel for petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for respondent no.1, Sri Piyush Kishore holding brief of Sri Neerav Chitravanshi, learned counsel for respondent no.2, and Sri Ran Vijay Singh, learned counsel for respondents no.3 and 4. With the consent of learned counsel appearing for the contesting parties, the writ petition is being finally decided. Under challenge is transfer order dated 06.08.2025, a copy of which is annexure no.2 to the petition by which the petitioner has been transferred from one sub-station to other. Learned counsel for petitioner has raised various grounds to challenge the impugned transfer order, however the Court is of the view that the said grounds fall in the realm of the grounds to be considered by the respondents at the first instance. Accordingly, without entering into the merits of the case, the present petition is disposed of leaving it open to the petitioner to submit a comprehensive representation against the impugned transfer order dated 06.08.2025 before respondent no. 4 within a period of two weeks from today. In case such a representation is made, respondent no. 4 shall proceed to decide the same in accordance with law considering the grounds taken by the petitioner in the representation, which would be decided within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of the representation alongwith copy of this order. Till disposal of representation no coercive action shall be taken by the respondents against the petitioner in pursuance of the impugned transfer order. It is made clear that if the petitioner does not submit his representation within the time specified, then the benefit of this order shall not be available to him. Order Date :- 20.8.2025 A. Katiyar Digitally signed by :- AMIT KATIYAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench