Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:48355 Court No. - 4 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 9244 of 2025 Petitioner :- Prahlad Mishra Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Co-Operative Deptt. Lko. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Vishal Srivastava,Narendra Kumar Mishra Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Shireesh Kumar Hon'ble Abdul Moin,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondent no.1, and Sri Anindya Sharstri, learned counsel, who files Vakalatnama on behalf of respondents no.2 and 3. 2. With the consent of learned counsels for the parties, the writ petition is being decided finally. 3. The contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that despite the petitioner having retired on 31.12.2022 his retiral dues have still not been paid. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner after arguing at some length submits that with regard to the relief sought in the writ petition, the petitioner may be permitted to submit a fresh representation before respondent no.2 which may be directed to be decided within a time frame fixed by this Court to which learned counsel appearing for respondents have no objection. 5. In view of the above, it is provided that in case the petitioner submits a representation within two weeks from today before respondent no.2 then respondent no.2 shall endevour to decide the same by means of a reasoned and speaking order within a further period of four weeks from the date of submission of the representation along with certified copy of this order. 6. It is also provided that in case any dues are found admissible the same would also be released within next four weeks provided there is no legal impediement. 7. With the aforesaid direction, writ petition is disposed off. 8. It is made clear that this Court has not gone into the merits of the case. Order Date :- 19.8.2025 A. Katiyar Digitally signed by :- AMIT KATIYAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench