Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 15836 (CHH)

PRABHA GURUPANCH v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPS/2188/2025 · 2025-04-03

Shri Bibhu Datta Guru

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 / 6 2025:CGHC:15584 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 2170 of 2025 1 - Kunti Bai Kothari W/o Late Shantanu Ram Kothari Aged About 34 Years R/o H.No. - 112, Ward No. - 7, Malwipara, Post - Sarona, Tehsil Narharpur, District North Bastar, Kanker Chhattisgarh --- Petitioner versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Its Secretary, Department Of School Education, Mantralaya Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, Atal Nagar, Post Office Rakhi, Dist. Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - Director Directorate Of Public Instructions, Indravati Bhawan, Atal Nagar, New Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh 3 - Collector North Bastar Kanker, District North Bastar Kanker, Chhattisgarh 4 - Janpad Panchayat, Narharpur Through Its Chief Executive Officer, District North Bastar Kanker, Chhattisgarh --- Respondent(s) with WPS No. 2175 of 2025 SOURABH BHILWAR Digitally signed by SOURABH BHILWAR Date: 2025.04.03 18:27:26 +0530 2 / 6 1 - Nirmala Nayak Wd/o Chitranjan Nayak Aged About 46 Years R/o Village Sarkanda, Post Limdarha, Tehsil Basna, District Mahasamund, C.G. ---Petitioner Versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Its Secretary, Department Of School Education, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, Atal Nagar, Post Office Rakhi, Dist. Raipur, C.G. 2 - Director, Directorate Of Public Instructions, Indravati Bhawan, Atal Nagar, New Raipur, Dist. Raipur, C.G. 3 - Collector, Mahasamund, District- Mahasamund, C.G. 4 - Zila Panchayat, Mahasamund, Through Its Chief Executive Officer, District Mahasamund, C.G. --- Respondent(s) with WPS No. 2188 of 2025 1 - Prabha Gurupanch W/o Late Ajay Kumar Gurupanch Aged About 40 Years R/o 226, R.E.S. Colony, Ward No. 10, Narharpur, North Bastar Kanker, Dist.- Kanker C.G. ---Petitioner Versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Its Secretary, Department Of School Education, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, Atal Nagar, Post Office Rakhi, Dist. Raipur, C.G. 3 / 6 2 - Director, Directorate Of Public Instructions, Indravati Bhawan, Atal Nagar, New Raipur, Dist. Raipur, C.G. 3 - Collector, North Bastar Kanker, District Kanker, C.G. 4 - Janpad Panchayat, Narharpur, Through Its Chief Executive Officer, District North Bastar Kanker, C.G. --- Respondent(s) with WPS No. 2191 of 2025 1 - Padmani Netam W/o Late Dhan Singh Netam Aged About 44 Years R/o Village- Gattasilli, Tehsil Nagari, District- Dhamtari, C.G. ---Petitioner Versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Its Secretary, Department Of School Education, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, Atal Nagar, Post Office Rakhi, Distt.- Raipur, C.G. 2 - Director Directorate Of Public Instructions, Indravati Bhawan, Atal Nagar, New Raipur, District- Raipur (Chhattisgarh) 3 - Collector Dhamtari, District- Dhamtari, C.G. 4 - Zila Panchayat Dhamtari Through Its Chief Executive Officer, District- Dhamtari, C.G. --- Respondent(s) with WPS No. 2194 of 2025 1 - Tamradhwaj Korram S/o Late Chinta Ram Korram Aged About 22 Years R/o Baroli, Tehsil Belargaon, District Dhamtari C.G. 4 / 6 ---Petitioner Versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Its Secretary, Department Of School Education, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, Atal Nagar, Post Office Rakhi, Dist. Raipur, C.G. 2 - Director, Directorate Of Public Instructions, Indravati Bhawan, Atal Nagar, New Raipur, District Raipur (Chhattisgarh) 3 - Collector, Dhamtari, District Dhamtari, C.G. 4 - Janpad Panchayat, Nagari, Through Its Chief Executive Officer, District Dhamtari C.G. --- Respondent(s) with WPS No. 2195 of 2025 1 - Chitaranjan Nayak S/o Late Shashidhar Nayak Aged About 23 Years R/o Khutgaon, Post- Tikrapara, Block And Tehsil Deobhog, District Gariyaband C.G. ---Petitioner Versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Its Secretary, Department Of School Education, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, Atal Nagar, Post Office Rakhi, Dist. Raipur Cg 2 - Director Directorate Of Public Instructions, Indravati Bhawan, Atal Nagar, New Raipur, District Raipur (Chhattisgarh) 3 - Collector Gariyaband, District Gariyaband C.G. 5 / 6 4 - Zila Panchayat Gariyaband, Through Its Chief Executive Officer, District Gariyaband, C.G. ... Respondents (Cause title is taken from Case Information System) For Petitioners : Mr. Vivek Kumar Shrivastava, Advocate For Respondents/ State : Mr. Vinay Pandey, Dy. Advocate General, Mr. S. S. Choubey, Ms. Nupur Trivedi, Ms. Akanksha Verma, Panel Lawyers (HON’BLE SHRI JUSTICE BIBHU DATTA GURU) Order on Board 03/04/2025 1. Since the identical issues involved in the above mentioned writ petitions, they are being heard and decided by this common order. 2. By the present writ petitions, the petitioners are seeking appropriate direction towards the respondent authorities for grant of compassionate appointment on account of their respective breadwinner as per circular dated 08/01/2016 issued by the State Government with regard to the compassionate appointment. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have submitted application for grant of compassionate appointment before respondent authority, but no action is taken on their applications for compassionate appointment. He submits that as since long time, neither the respondent authorities has taken any decision nor any direction has been issued with respect to claim of the petitioners, the respondent authorities be directed to consider and decide the claim of the petitioners for grant of compassionate appointment. 6 / 6 4. Learned counsel appearing for the State submits that grievance of the petitioners is against respondent Zila/Janapd Panchayat for whom he is not appearing. 5. I have heard learned counsel for parties and perused the documents placed on record. 6. Considering the submissions made by learned counsel for respective parties as also the grievance of the petitioners that application submitted by them for grant of compassionate appointment has not been considered, therefore, these writ petitions, at this stage, are disposed of permitting the petitioners to submit a fresh representation/ application raising all the grounds as raised in these writ petitions. In the event of filing of such representation, the concerned authorities shall consider and decide the same in accordance with law and on its own merit expeditiously preferably within a period of three months from the date of receipt of application/representation. 7. With the aforesaid direction, all these Writ Petitions stand disposed of. Sd/- (BIBHU DATTA GURU) JUDGE $. Bhilwar