CHHOTU MISTRI @ AHMAD HUSAIN v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO.
BAIL/7692/2025 · 2025-08-21
Subhash Vidyarthi
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 158355 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 158355 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:49098 Court No. - 13 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 7692 of 2025 Applicant :- Chhotu Mistri @ Ahmad Husain Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. Counsel for Applicant :- Piyush Kumar Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Subhash Vidyarthi,J.
1. Heard Sri Piyush Kumar Singh, the learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Manish Vikram Singh Chauhan, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the records. Supplementary affidavit filed by the learned counsel for the applicant is taken on record. 2. The instant application has been filed seeking release of the applicant on bail in Case Crime No.116 of 2025, under Section 3(1) of Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and Antisocial Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, registered at Police Station Tulsipur, District Balrampur. 3. The gang chart mentions involvement of the applicant in one case, in which he has been granted bail. 4. In the affidavit filed in support of bail application it has been stated that the applicant is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in the present case. It has also been stated in the affidavit filed in support of the bail application that the applicant is neither a leader nor member of any gang. 5. The learned A.G.A had pointed out the involvement of the applicant in two other cases. A supplementary affidavit has been filed on behalf of the applicant stating that the applicant has been granted bail in both the cases. 6. Having considered the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and the fact that the applicant has been granted bail in a solitary case and in the other two cases, in which, he is involved and that the applicant is languishing in jail since 22.07.2025 and without making any observation, which may affect the merits of the case, I am of the view that the aforesaid facts are sufficient for making out a case for enlargement of the applicant on bail in the aforesaid crime. 7. Accordingly, this bail application stands allowed. 8.
Let the applicant- Chhotu Mistri @ Ahmad Husain be released on bail in the aforesaid case on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of magistrate/court concerned, subject to following conditions:- (i) the applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence; (ii) the applicant shall not pressurize the prosecution witnesses; (iii) the applicant shall appear on each and every date fixed by the trial court, unless his appearance is exempted by the learned trial court. (Subhash Vidyarthi, J.) Order Date :- 21.8.2025 Preeti. Digitally signed by :- PREETI GAUTAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench