JALALUDDIN v. UNION OF INDIA THRU. SECY. MINISTRY OF EXTERNAL AFFAIRS AND 2 OTHERS
WRIC/7979/2025 · 2025-08-20
Brij Raj Singh, Sangeeta Chandra
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 158354 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 158354 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:48738-DB Court No. - 2 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 7979 of 2025 Petitioner :- Jalaluddin Respondent :- Union Of India Thru. Secy. Ministry Of External Affairs And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Virendra Kumar Shukla Counsel for Respondent :- A.S.G.I.,C.S.C. Hon'ble Mrs. Sangeeta Chandra,J. Hon'ble Brij Raj Singh,J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Shri S.B. Pandey, learned Senior Counsel as well as Deputy Solicitor General of India assisted by Shri Varun Pandey, learned counsel for the Union of India as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State and perused the record.
2. This writ petition has been filed by petitioner with following main prayers:
"a. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding/directing the Opposite party no.2 to renew the passport bearing No.K0548609 in favour of the petitioner in pursuance of application filed by petitioner dated 17.01.2022 bearing File No. LK307602598142, as contained in Annexure No.2 to this writ petition, in the interest of justice. b. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding/directing the Opposite. parties to act in accordance with law."
3. It has been submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has made an application on 17.01.2022 in the office of opposite party no.2 i.e. Regional Passport Officer, Lucknow requesting him to renew his passport by placing reliance on the Notification No.GSR 570(E) dated 25.08.1993, which mentions that during pendency of a criminal case
passport can be issued, however, respondents have not taken any decision on his application, hence this writ petition has been filed with the aforesaid prayer.
4. Learned counsel for the parties have agreed that the issue raised in this writ petition has been decided by this Court in Writ-C No.2309 of 2025; Mohd. Aanis versus U.O.I and 3 others, Neutral Citation No.2025:AHC-LKO:14032-DB.
5. We find that a criminal case is pending against the petitioner before an appropriate court and, therefore, this writ petition is
disposed of with direction to the petitioner to approach the trial court concerned by moving an appropriate application. The trial court concerned will pass an appropriate order strictly in accordance with law for granting permission to the petitioner to go abroad on conditions which it deems appropriate. Only thereafter his case for issuance of passport can be considered by the Regional Passport Officer concerned. . (Brij Raj Singh,J.) (Sangeeta Chandra,J.)
Order Date :- 20.8.2025 Anupam S/- Digitally signed by :- ANUPAM SINGH PATEL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench