HAREENDRA @ HAREENDRA KUMAR v. ADDL. COMMISSIONER (JUDICIAL), AYODHYA DIVISION, AYODHYA AND OTHERS
A227/4914/2025 · 2025-08-19
Alok Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 158341 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 158341 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:48522 Court No. - 5 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 4914 of 2025 Petitioner :- Hareendra @ Hareendra Kumar Respondent :- Addl. Commissioner (Judicial), Ayodhya Division, Ayodhya And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Kuldeep Dubey,Abhay Kumar Pandey,Ashish Kumar Shukla,Rajesh Yadav Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Mohan Singh Hon'ble Alok Mathur,J.
1. Heard Sri Kuldeep Dubey, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents.
2. In view of the order proposed to be passed, requirement of issuance of notice to private respondents is dispensed with.
3. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioner praying for direction to the respondent No. 1 - Additional Commissioner (Judicial), Ayodhya Division, Ayodhya to decide Revision No. 1283 of 2021 (Computerized Case No. C202104000001283) - Rajendra Prasad and Others Vs. Hareendra and Others, U/S 210 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, expeditiously.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance of the petitioner would be sufficiently met in case respondent no. 1 - Additional Commissioner (Judicial), Ayodhya Division, Ayodhya, considers and decides the aforesaid case in the time bound manner.
5. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the aforesaid prayer.
6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without entering into the merits of the case, respondent no. 1 - Additional Commissioner (Judicial), Ayodhya Division, Ayodhya, is directed to decide Revision No. 1283 of 2021 (Computerized Case No. C202104000001283) - Rajendra Prasad and Others Vs. Hareendra and Others, U/S 210 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, expeditiously, say within a period of six months from the date of production of certified copy of this order, in accordance with law, if there is no legal impediment.
7. It is further directed that the parties to the case shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case and shall not seek any unnecessary adjournment, neither any such adjournment shall be granted by the Court concerned, except in exceptional circumstances.
8. With above observations/directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. Order Date :- 19.8.2025 A. Verma (Alok Mathur, J.) Digitally signed by :- ANURAG VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench