- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:14569 WP No. 31695 of 2016 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 4TH DAY OF APRIL, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N S SANJAY GOWDA WRIT PETITION NO. 31695 OF 2016 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN: H.G. SATYANARAYANA SINCE DECEASED BY HIS LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES 1. CHINNAMMA WIFE AGED ABOUT 71 YEARS 2. H.S. JAGANNATH, SON AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS 3. H.S. DIWAKAR SON AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS 4. H.S. DHARMENDRA SON AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS ALL ARE RESIDING AT NO.2/10, 6TH 'A' CROSS, GOPALAPURA MAGADI ROAD, BANGALORE - 560023 AMENDED AS DIRECTED BY HON'BLE COURT ON 04.04.2025. …PETITIONERS (BY SMT. SHOBHA BAHVIKATTI, ADVOCATE FOR LRS OF PETITIONER) Digitally signed by KIRAN KUMAR R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:14569 WP No. 31695 of 2016 AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS REVENUE SECRETARY TO GOVT. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE M.S. BUILDINGS, 5TH FLOOR, BANGALORE - 560001 2. THE SPECIAL DEPUTY COMMISSIONER URBAN DISTRICT, BANGALORE K.G. ROAD, BANGALORE - 560009 …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. SAVITHRAMMA, AGA FOR RESPONDENTS) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO CALL FOR THE RECORDS IN RRT/2/CR/27/2002-03 ON THE FILE OF THE LEARNED SPECIAL DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, BANGALORE DISTRICT, THE RESPONDENT NO.2 VIDE ANNEXURE-J AND QUASH THE ERRONEOUS ORDER DATED 26 AUG 2009 IN RRT/2/CR/27/2002-03 PASSED BY THE LEARNED SPECIAL DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, BANGALORE DISTRICT, THE RESPONDENT NO.2 HEREIN VIDE ANNEXURE-J IN SO FAR AS THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY HEREIN ARE CONCERNED AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N S SANJAY GOWDA - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:14569 WP No. 31695 of 2016 ORAL ORDER 1. It is not in dispute that the order impugned in this writ petition was the subject matter of writ petition No.38177 of 2011 connected with W.P. No.36906 of 2016 and this Court by order dated 21.06.2022 allowed the writ petitions and directed the revenue entries be restored as it stood prior to the impugned order passed by the Special Deputy Commissioner. 2. It is also not in dispute that the order passed by this Court has been confirmed in W.A. No.1019 of 2024 on 22.08.2024. 3. It is therefore clear that the revenue authorities are bound to restore the name as ordered in the aforementioned writ petition. 4. This shall be done within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 5. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of. - 4 - NC: 2025:KHC:14569 WP No. 31695 of 2016 6. In view of the disposal of the petition, all pending interlocutory applications, if any, stand disposed of. Sd/- (N S SANJAY GOWDA) JUDGE RK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 90