Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 15833 (HP)

Reena Dogra v. STATE OF HP

CMP-T/249/2025 · 2025-06-04

Satyen Vaidya

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Reena Dogra Vs. State of H.P. & Ors. CMP-T-249 of 2025 in CWPOA No.5541 of 2020 04.06.2025 Present: Mr. Vinay Mehta, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Hemant K. Verma, Deputy Advocate General for respondents/State. Mr. Udit Shaurya Kaushik, Advocate for respondents No.5 to 7. CMP-T 249 of 2025 Learned counsel for respondents seeks time to file reply. However, I find that the application is formal in nature and can be allowed. This will not cause any prejudice to the respondents as they will be entitled to file documents in rebuttal, if any. Accordingly, application is allowed. The documents of the application are ordered to be taken on record, subject to all just exceptions. (Satyen Vaidya) Judge 4th June, 2025 (rupsi)