Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 158314 (ALL)

RANJANA PANDEY AND 2 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF GENERAL ADMINISTRATION LKO AND 2 OTHERS

WRIC/7941/2025 · 2025-08-25

Brij Raj Singh, Sangeeta Chandra

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 7941 of 2025 Court No. - 2 HON'BLE MRS. SANGEETA CHANDRA, J. HON'BLE BRIJ RAJ SINGH, J. 1. Sri Pawan Kumar Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioners states that this writ petition has become infructuous, as the certificate, that was withheld by the District Magistrate, has now been issued. 2. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection. 3. The writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. August 25, 2025 Sachin Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Pawan Kumar Pandey, Ajay Kumar Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Brij Raj Singh,J.) (Mrs. Sangeeta Chandra,J.) Ranjana Pandey And 2 Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of General Administration Lko And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SACHIN MEHROTRA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench