Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 15830 (UTT)

SAHIL KUMAR v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPCRL/897/2025 · 2025-11-17

Ashish Naithani

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

SL. No. Dat e Of f ice Not es, r epor t s, or ders or pr oceedin gs or dir ect ion s an d Regist r ar’s or der w it h Sign at u r es COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS 2025:UHC:10160 WPCRL No.897 of 2025 Hon ’ble Ash ish Nait h an i, J. None present for the Petitioner. 2. Mr. N.S. Kanyal, learned AGA, for the State of Uttarakhand. 3. Mr. Vaibhav Singh Chauhan, learned counsel for the private Respondents. 4. A statement has been given by the learned State Counsel that the charge-sheet has been submitted in this matter before the court concerned, and the matter has become infructuous. This fact is admitted by the learned counsel for the private Respondent. 5. In view of the above statement, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. ( Ash ish Nait h an i, J.) 1 7 .1 1 .2 0 2 5 Nitesh/