Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 1583 (UTT)

PRADEEP SINGH v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

ABA/101/2025 · 2025-02-06

Pankaj Purohit

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS ABA No.101 of 2025 Hon’ble Pankaj Purohit, J. Mr. Aakib Ahmed, learned counsel holding brief of Mr. S.K. Mandal, learned counsel for the applicant. 2. Mr. G.S. Sandhu, learned Government Advocate along with Mr. Vipul Painuly, learned Brief Holder for the State. 3. Learned counsel for the State made a statement at bar that the applicant has been arrested, therefore, the present anticipatory bail application has rendered infructuous. 4. This fact is admitted by learned counsel for the applicant. 5. In view of the statement made by learned State Counsel, the present anticipatory bail application is dismissed as infructuous. (Pankaj Purohit, J.) Vacation Judge 06.02.2025 AK