MICRA INFRATECH PVT. LTD THRU. AUTHORISED SIGNATORY,RISHABH VASHISHT v. STATE OF U.P. INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT DEPTT. U.P. SECTT.LKO. THRU. PRIN. SECY. AND 2OTHERS
A227/4888/2025 · 2025-09-10
Jaspreet Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 158299 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 158299 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 4888 of 2025 Court No. - 7 HON'BLE JASPREET SINGH, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents. 2. The instant petition has been preferred seeking the following reliefs:- (a) pass an order or direction directing the respondent no.1 to pronounce the judgment on the revision petition bearing no.as 56 Appeal/77-4-22 Annexure no.14 pursuant to the hearing held on 06.06.2025 at an early date as may be fixed by this Hon'ble Court. (b) pass any other order or direction as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case. 3. The record further indicates that on 18.08.2025 learned Standing Counsel was directed to seek instructions in the matter and as per the instructions which have been placed on record on an earlier occasion. It was informed that the matter would be taken up on
01.09.2025. It is in this view that the Court had deferred the hearing and fixed 10.09.2025. 4. Today again learned Standing Counsel has provided a copy of the written instructions for perusal of the Court which is taken on record indicating that the parties and the counsel had appeared before the Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Siddharth Nandwani Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Sachin Upadhyay Micra Infratech Pvt. Ltd Thru. Authorised Signatory,Rishabh Vashisht .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Industrial Development Deptt. U.P. Sectt.Lko. Thru. Prin. Secy. And 2others .....Respondent(s)
respondent no.1 on 01.09.2025 and the hearing was concluded. However, it is prayed that three weeks' time be further granted to pass the appropriate orders on the hearing completed on 01.09.2025. In this view of the matter, this Court does not find that any gainful purpose will be served in keeping the petition pending. 5. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent no.1 that as per his own request he shall ensure that the proceedings are finally decided within a period of three weeks from today. 6. It is made clear that the Court has not examined the merits of any of the parties and the parties shall take a decision in accordance with law. 7. With the aforesaid, the petition is disposed of.
September 10, 2025 ank A227 No. 4888 of 2025 2 (Jaspreet Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- ALI NEWAZ KHAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench