DR. SARWAN KUMAR SAINI SON OF SH. RAM CHANDRA SAINI v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CW/6060/2025 · 2025-04-25
Mahendar Kumar Goyal
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 15829 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 15829 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:17509] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 6060/2025 Dr. Sarwan Kumar Saini Son Of Sh. Ram Chandra Saini, Aged About 50 Years, Resident Of Village Sainipura, Post Mandrella, Tehsil Chirawa, District Jhunjhunu. ----Petitioner Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Principal Secretary, Department Of Higher Education, Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. Commissioner, College Education, Siksha Sankul, J.l.n. Marg, Jaipur. 3. Principal, Shri Radhey Shyam R. Morarka Government College, Jhunjhunu. 4. Principal, Shri Radhey Shyam R. Morarka Government College, Nawalgarh, District Jhunjhunu. ----Respondents Connected with S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 6126/2025
1. Dr. Mansingh Awana S/o Ramkesh Gurjar, Aged About 34 Years, R/o Village Sahajpur, Post Gandal, Tehsil Gangapurcity, District Sawaimadhopur, Rajasthan. Working As Assistant Professor (Political Science) Guest Faculty Under Vidhya Sambal Yojna At Govt. College, Hindauncity, Karauli. 2. Dr. Ramesh Chand Saini S/o Heera Lal Saini, Aged About 36 Years, R/o Vpo Ralawata, Tehsil Nainwa, District Bundi, Rajasthan. Working As Assistant Professor (Hindi) Guest Faculty Under Vidhya Sambal Yojna At Govt. College, Hindauli, District Bundi. 3. Sanjay Kumar Meena S/o Ram Kishan Meena, Aged About 41 Years, R/o 65, Jatav Basti, Pabaini, Dholpur, Rajasthan. Working As Assistant Professor (Hindi) Guest Faculty Under Vidhya Sambal Yojna At Govt. Girls College, Sukar, Bamanwas, Sawaimadhopur. 4. Ankit Meena S/o Sukhram Meena, Aged About 34 Years, R/o Gumla Road, Bamanwas Patti, Bamanwas, District
[2025:RJ-JP:17509] (2 of 3) [CW-6060/2025] Sawaimadhopur, Rajasthan. Working As Assistant Professor (History) Guest Faculty Under Vidhya Sambal Yojna At Govt. Girls College, Sukar, Bamanwas, Sawaimadhopur. ----Petitioners Versus
1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through The Secretary, Higher Education, Secretariat, Government Of Rajasthan, Jaipur. 2. The Commissioner, College Education, Block 4, Shiksha Sankul, Jln Marg, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 3. The Principal, Govt. P.g. College, Hindauncity, Karauli
4. The Principal, Govt. College, Hindauncity, Karauli
5. The Principal, Govt. College, Bamanwas, District Sawaimadhopur. 6. The Principal, Govt. Girls College, Sukar, Bamanwas, District Sawaimadhopur. 7. The Principal, Govt. College Hindoli, District Bundi. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Babulal Saini Mr. Ram Pratap Saini with Mr. Aamir Khan For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL Judgment / Order 25/04/2025 Since, the issues involved in both the petitions are common, they are being tagged. These writ petitions are filed seeking a direction to the respondents not to discontinue services of the petitioners as Guest Faculty under the Vidhya Sambal Yojna (for brevity “the Scheme”).
[2025:RJ-JP:17509] (3 of 3) [CW-6060/2025] Learned counsels for the petitioners submit that they are already working as Guest Faculty under the Scheme but, the respondents have issued fresh advertisement dated 06.02.2025 inviting applications for fresh appointment in different colleges including the colleges in which they worked as the Guest Faculty in the last academic session. The issue involved herein is no more res integra and stands resolved by a coordinate Bench order of this Court dated 28.08.2023 passed in the case of Ram Chaturvedi & Ors. versus State of Rajasthan & Ors.: SB Civil Writ Petition No.1474/2023 pursuant whereof, the Additional Commissioner, College Education, Rajasthan, Jaipur has issued the circular dated
20.03.2025. In view of the aforesaid, these writ petitions are disposed of with a direction to the respondents to ensure compliance of the directions issued in the case of Ram Chaturvedi & Ors. (supra) and the circular dated 20.03.2025. Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of. If the respondents feel aggrieved of this order, they are at liberty to file an application for its recalling. (MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL),J Manish/25 & 29