ARJUN KEWAT @ ARJUN AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF HOME LKO. AND ANOTHER
A482/6787/2025 · 2025-08-20
Shree Prakash Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 158248 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 158248 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:49062 Court No. - 14 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 6787 of 2025 Applicant :- Arjun Kewat @ Arjun And Another Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Home Lko. And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Mangal Sen Yadav,Deepansi Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Shree Prakash Singh,J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicants as well as learned AGA for the State and perused the record.
2. Instant application under section 482 Cr.P.C./528 of the B.N.S.S. has been filed with the prayer to quash the charge- sheet dated 29.03.2017 filed in FIR No.0330/2016 under Sections 308 and 506 IPC lodged at Police Station Kadipur, District Sultanpur, to quash the orders dated 13.03.2018 and 21.07.2025 passed by the learned C.J.M., Court No. 16, Sultanpur in Criminal Case No.4021/2024 (State Vs. Arjun Kewat and another) by means of which cognizance of the offence has been taken and the applicants have been summoned to face trial.
3. Learned counsel appearing for the applicants submits that the applicants are innocent and were never involved in committing the offence as has been mentioned in the first information report. He added that due to enmity, their names have been planted in the first information report and thereafter they have been charge-sheeted. He next added that due to unavoidable circumstances, they could not appear before the trial below.
4. At this stage, learned counsel for the applicants submits that he does not want to press the application and seeks liberty to
file bail application before the learned trial court which may be decided in view of law laid by Hon'ble Supreme Court's
judgment in the case of Satender Kumar Antil versus Central Bureau of Investigation and another (2022)10 SCC 51.
5. Learned A.G.A. has no objection to the prayer made by
learned counsel for the applicants.
6. On due consideration to the submissions of learned counsel for the parties', it is provided that in case, the applicants appear before the trial court within two weeks from today and file bail application, the same shall be considered and decided expeditiously in view of law laid down in the case of Satender Kumar Antil (supra).
7. The application is disposed of accordingly. [Shree Prakash Singh,J.]
Order Date :- 20.8.2025 MVS/- Digitally signed by :- MANOJ VIKRAM SINGH CHAUHAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- MANOJ VIKRAM SINGH CHAUHAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench