SUHEL BEG AND OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND OTHERS
CRLP/7539/2025 · 2025-09-02
Rajesh Singh Chauhan, S Q H Rizvi
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 158243 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 158243 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 7539 of 2025 Court No. - 9 HON'BLE RAJESH SINGH CHAUHAN, J.
HON'BLE SYED QAMAR HASAN RIZVI, J.
1. Heard Sri Suresh Chandra Srivastava, learned counsel for the petitioners, Sri Akhilesh Kumar Srivastava, learned A.G.A. for the State-respondents and perused the material placed on record.
2. In view of the proposed order being passed, notice to respondents No. 3 is hereby dispensed with.
3. By means of the present writ petition, the petitioners have assailed the following prayers:
"(i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the impugned First Information Report dated 02.04.2025 lodged by Opposite Party no. 3 contained at Annexure No. 1 to this writ petition against the petitioners, which has been registered as Case Crime No. 0255/2025, under Sections 85, 115(2), 352, 351(2) BNS, Section 3/4 D.P. Act and Section 3/4 of the Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Marriage) Act, 2019, Police Station Kotwali Nagar, District Sultanpur, in the interest of justice. (ii) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the opposite parties, not to arrest the petitioners on the basis of the aforesaid First Information Report dated 02.04.2025 contained at Annexure No. 1 to this writ petition."
4. Learned A.G.A. on the basis of specific written instruction, has informed that during the course of investigation, the name of petitioner nos. 2 to 7 have been deleted and against the petitioner no. 1, who is the husband of the Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Suresh Chandra Srivastava, Vaibhav Srivastava Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. Suhel Beg And Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And Others .....Respondent(s)
opposite party no. 3, charge-sheet has been filed only under Section 3/4 of the Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Marriage) Act, 2019, wherein the punishment is upto seven years. The aforesaid instruction is taken on record.
5. In the wake of aforesaid development, nothing remains to be adjudicated in this writ petition, therefore, this writ petition is consigned to record. However, it is always open for the petitioner no. 1 to take appropriate remedy before appropriate authority/Court of law. September 2, 2025 Arun CRLP No. 7539 of 2025 2 (Syed Qamar Hasan Rizvi,J.) (Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J.) Digitally signed by :- ARUN KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench