Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 15824 (AP)

KORLEPARA VENKATA RAMANA MURTHY v. THE STATE OF AP

WP/10735/2025 · 2025-07-21

Subba Reddy Satti

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010204432025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3331] TUESDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION NO: 10735/2025 Between: 1. KORLEPARA VENKATA RAMANA MURTHY, S/O K. KOTESWARUDU, AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS, TREASURER OF MID VALLEY CITY, FLAT NO. 107, MID VALLEY CITY, ATMAKURU (V), MANGALAGIRI(M), GUNTUR DISTRICT, PIN.522503,A.P. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE (STAMP AND REGISTRATION) GOVERNMENT OF A.P. SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI-522501. 2. THE DISTRICT REGISTRAR, 8C2J PLUS 279, R AND B QUARTERS, GUNTUR, ANDHRA PRADESH-522004. 3. SIVA PRAKASH RAO MUNTHA, S/O RAMA KRISHNA RAO, AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS, R/O MID-VALLEY CITY, EVEREST BLOCK, ATMAKUR MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 4. GUTTA BALAJI, S/O G.SUBAS CHANDRA BOSE, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, R/O MID-VALLEY CITY, KAILASH BLOCK, ATMAKUR MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 5. VASIREDDY NAGARJUNA, S/O V KRISHNA MURTHY, AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS, R/O MID-VALLEY CITY, EVEREST BLOCK, ATMAKUR MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 6. VENIGALLA LEELA KRISHNA, V SATYANARAYANA, AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, R/O EVEREST BLOCK, ATMAKUR ,MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 7. J RAMESH, S/O J CHANDRASHEKAR, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, R/O MID-VALLEY CITY, EVEREST BLOCK, ATMAKUR , MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 8. SAJJAN KUMAR MAAN, S/O SHISH RAM, AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS, R/O MID-VALLEY CITY, EVEREST BLOCK, ATMAKUR, MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. RR 3 TO 8 ARE IMPLEADED AS PER THE COURT'S ORDER DT.20.06.2025 IN I.A.NO. 02 OF 2025 ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue appropriate writ, order or direction, more particularly, in the nature of writ of mandamus directing the respondents to Register the Association pursuant to the Application filed by the Petitioner on 17th April 2025 vide Application No. SCRO12500096810 under The Andhra Pradesh Societies Registration Act 2001 and further hold the in action of the respondents more particularly Respondent No. 2, as violative of Fundamental rights of the Petitioner under Articles 14, 16, 21, and more particularly Article 19 (1) (c) to form an Association under the Constitution of India and further hold the unlawful demands made by the Respondent as illegal, arbitrary and be pleased to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to issue an interim order or direction, directing the Respondents more particularly Respondent No: 2, to Register the Association / Society vide Application of the Petitioner bearing no.SCRO12500096810, dated 17th April, 2025, pending disposal of the Writ Petition,and be pleased to pass IA NO: 2 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to permit the petitioners herein to come on record as Proposed Respondent No.3 to 8 in WP.No.10735 of 2025 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. JAMADAGNI CHITTALA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. PRASAD BABU MOGALATHURTI 2. GP FOR REGISTRATION AND STAMPS The Court made the following: ORDER Learned counsel for petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the writ petition. Permission, as sought for, is accorded. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is Dismissed as Withdrawn. No costs. As a sequel, all the pending miscellaneous petitions, shall stand closed. ___________________________ JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI PVD