Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 158234 (ALL)

HARIKESH SINGH AND 2 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. REVENUE DEPTT. LKO. AND 3 OTHERS

WRIC/7943/2025 · 2025-08-27

Brij Raj Singh, Sangeeta Chandra

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 7943 of 2025 Court No. - 2 HON'BLE MRS. SANGEETA CHANDRA, J. HON'BLE BRIJ RAJ SINGH, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents. 2. This petition has been filed by the petitioners with following main prayers:- "a. Issue any writ or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the O. P. No-2/District Magistrate, Amethi to take appropriate action upon the application dated 30.07.2025 of petitioners contained as Annexure No-7 with this writ petition, in the interest of justice, in the interest of justice. b. Issue any writ or order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the Opposite Parties to protect the land of petitioners contained as Annexure No-1 with this writ petition, in the interest of justice." 3. We have gone through the representation, which has been filed as Annexure-7 to the writ petitioner and we find from the same that the petitioners had earlier approached this Court in Writ-B No.846 of 2024 and in pursuance of interim order dated 12.9.2024, the respondents had demarcated the land of the petitioners and had handed over the same to the petitioners. The Advocate of the petitioners had admitted this fact and the writ petition was disposed of thereafter. However, it appears that there is some dispute relating to demarcation that had again arisen. The Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Shiv Shankar Singh, Rakesh Kumar Mishra Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Harikesh Singh And 2 Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue Deptt. Lko. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) appropriate remedy for the petitioners is to file an application under Section 24 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 for demarcation before the authority concerned. The matter cannot be decided on the basis of representation given on administrative side. 4. This writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the petitioners to move an appropriate application under Section 24 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 for demarcation before the authority concerned. August 27, 2025 Sachin WRIC No. 7943 of 2025 2 (Brij Raj Singh,J.) (Mrs. Sangeeta Chandra,J.) Digitally signed by :- SACHIN MEHROTRA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench