MALLELA PRAVEEN KUMAR v. The State of Andhra Pradesh,
WP/10603/2025 · 2025-04-28
Venkateswarlu Nimmagadda
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 15823 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 15823 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI MAIN CASE No.: W.P.No.10115 of 2025
PROCEEDING SHEET Sl.No DATE
ORDER OFFICE NOTE
01.
28.04.2025 NV, J
Heard the
learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the respondents.
The claim of the petitioner herein is that the petitioner’s father was granted D-form patta in respect of property admeasuring to an extent of ….Kanigiri
After the demise of the petitioner’s father, the petitioner being his legal heir, has succeeded the subject property along with his two sisters and they were issued pattadar passbook and land title deed in respect of the subject property. Since then, they have been in possession and enjoyment of the same.
While things stood thus, without following the due procedure as contemplated, the respondents are trying to evict the petitioner from the subject land. Hence the present Writ Petition.
On the other hand, the learned Government Pleader has furnished a copy of written instructions…. wherein, the relevant portion is usefully extracted hereunder:
On perusal of the written instructions
furnished by the learned Government Pleader, it appears that the respondents have passed an
order of resumption on 21.08.2024 and the same was implemented and the revenue records were modified on 27.04.2025.
In reply, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that neither the Order of Resumption dated 21.08.2025 nor the alteration of entries in the web land on 27.04.2025 were served upon the petitioner.
Having regard to the submission of the
learned counsel for the petitioner and the
learned counsel for the respondents and on perusal of the material available on record, this Court is of the considered view that the present Writ Petition can be disposed of directing the respondents to furnish the copy of the Order of Resumption dated 21.08.2025 and the Order of the deletion of entries of the petitioner in the webland dated 27.04.2025, within a period of two (02) weeks from the date of the receipt of a copy of this Order pursuant to the representation or application by the petitioner seeking for furnishing of the copy as mentioned above. Upon such submission, the petitioner is at liberty to initiate appropriate legal proceedings as entitled in accordance with law. In the meanwhile, there shall be status-quo obtained as on today shall be maintained by all the parties concerned in respect of the possession of the subject property of the petitioner.
________ NV, J SCH