IN 115 Manpreet K State of Pun CORAM: PRESENT: SANJAY V 1. Constitution No.2 & 3, t have marrie 2. Manpreet K 31 years, h their family the petition petitioners. to interfere are seeking of filing the 20.01.2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUN AT CHANDIG reet Kaur and another Versus Punjab and others AM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SA ENT: Mr. Rajesh Kumar Kashyap, for the petitioners. AY VASHISTH, J. (Oral) Prayer in the instant petition titution of India, is for issuance of d & 3, to provide protection of lives an married against the wishes of responde Learned counsel for the petition reet Kaur, aged 21 years and petition ars, have solemnized marriage on family members, arrayed as responden etitioners further submits that it is oners. It has been submitted that the pr erfere in the matrimonial life of the p eking protection in that regard and ha ng the instant petition. They have also .2025 (Annexure P-5), to respondent F PUNJAB AND HARYANA NDIGARH CRWP-654-2025(O&M Decided on :22.01.202 . . . Petitione ersus . . . Responden E SANJAY VASHISTH Advocate **** etition filed under Article 226 of th e of directions to official responden ives and liberty of the petitioners, wh ndents No. 4 to 7. petitioners submits that petitioner No.1 oner No.2–Amandeep Singh age on 20.01.2025, against the wishes o ondents No.4 to 7. Learned counsel fo it is the first marriage of both th t the private respondents are threatenin f the petitioners. Hence, the petitione and have approached this Court by wa ve also submitted a representation date ndent No.2–The Senior Superintende O&M) 01.2025 titioners ondents of the ondents rs, who r No.1– aged ishes of nsel for oth the eatening titioners by way n dated tendent RASHMI 2025.01.22 19:33 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRWP-654 of Police, 3. 4. notice on be learned Stat 5. to responden the represen and if there law, to ensu at the hands both the pe No.3 is alrea 6. have taken criminal act law. January 22 Rashmi Whether spea Whether Repo 54-2025(O&M) Patiala, wherein, they have expre Notice of motion to respondent On advance notice, Mr. Amand on behalf of respondents No.1 to 3 (S Let requisite copies of the com d State counsel during course of the d Accordingly, the present petitio pondent No.2– The Senior Superintend presentation dated 20.01.2025 (Anne f there is any substance in it, take nec o ensure that the lives and liberty of hands of the private respondents. Looking at the fact that there the petitioners, the official responde is already married or not. However, this direction will n taken place between the parties and w nal action, which could be initiated i 22, 2025 speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Reportable: Yes/No - 2 - expressed their apprehension. ndents No.1 to 3 only. mandeep Singh, DAG, Punjab, accep to 3 (State). he complete paper book be supplied f the day. petition is disposed of with a directio rintendent of Police, Patiala to look in (Annexure P-5), qua threat perceptio ke necessary steps, in accordance wi ty of the petitioners are not jeopardize there is 10 years of age gap betwee pondents would also ensure petition will not validate the marriage said and will have no effect on any civil o iated in the matter in accordance wi (SANJAY VASHISTH JUDGE accepts plied to irection ook into ception, ce with ardized between etitioner said to civil or ce with ISTH) RASHMI 2025.01.22 19:33 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document