Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 158194 (ALL)

AYUSH BHUSHAN v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT. GOVT. OF U.P. LKO.

BAIL/7641/2025 · 2025-08-20

Subhash Vidyarthi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:48717 Court No. - 13 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 7641 of 2025 Applicant :- Ayush Bhushan Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Govt. Of U.P. Lko. Counsel for Applicant :- Avinash Kumar Srivastava Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Subhash Vidyarthi,J. 1. A supplementary affidavit sworn by the applicant's mother (the informant) has been filed by the learned counsel for the applicant, which is taken on record. 2. Heard Shri Avinash Kumar Srivastava, learned counsel for the applicant, Shri Rajesh Kumar Singh, learned A.G.A.-I for the State and perused the records. 3. The instant application has been filed seeking release of the applicant on bail in Case Crime No.191 of 2025 under Sections 115(2), 131, 326(g), 351(3) of B.N.S. registered at Police Station- Inayat Nagar, District- Ayodhya. 4. The aforesaid case has been registered on the basis of an F.I.R. lodged by the applicant's mother on 01.05.2025 stating that the applicant had extracted a large amount of cash and jewellery from her after threatening her with a knife and he had poured petrol on her body and in three rooms of his house and set the house ablaze. 5. In the affidavit filed in support of the bail application, it has been stated that the applicant is a young man aged 20 years and he has been falsely implicated in the present case. 6. The applicant's involvement in three other criminal cases has been disclosed in para-10 of the affidavit, all of which relate to the period while he was juvenile and he was not arrested in any of those cases. 7. The supplementary affidavit in support of the bail applicant has been filed by the complainant herself stating that the applicant is suffering from some psychiatric disorder for which he is undergoing treatment. He has turned aggressive due to his ailment, he lost his control over his emotions though he has no intention to harm his mother. 8. Learned A.G.A.-I has vehemently opposed the bail application and he has submitted that allegations levelled against the applicant make out commission of serious offence and he could not be released on bail. 9. Having considered the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and keeping in view the fact that the FIR was lodged by mother of the accused applicant and she herself has come forward to file a supplementary affidavit supporting the application for released of the applicant stating that the applicant is suffering from psychiatric disorder for which he is undergoing treatment, I am of the view that the aforesaid facts are sufficient for making out a case for enlargement of the applicant on bail in the aforesaid case. 10. Accordingly, this bail application stands allowed. 11. Let the applicant- Ayush Bhushan be released on bail in the aforementioned case on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of Magistrate/Court concerned, subject to following conditions:- (i) the applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence; (ii) the applicant shall not pressurize the prosecution witnesses; (iii) the applicant shall appear on each and every date fixed by the trial Court. . [Subhash Vidyarthi, J.] Order Date :- 20.8.2025 -Amit K- Digitally signed by :- AMIT KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- AMIT KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- AMIT KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench