Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 158193 (ALL)

LALLU @ INDRAJEET AND 3 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND ANOTHER

NA528/976/2025 · 2025-08-18

Shree Prakash Singh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:48291 Court No. - 14 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 976 of 2025 Applicant :- Lallu @ Indrajeet And 3 Others Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Jnanendra Pratap Shukla Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Shree Prakash Singh,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicants, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. 2. Instant application under Section 482 Cr.P.C./ 528 B.N.S.S. has been filed with the following relief:- "i. quash the impugned summoning order dated 19.06.2025, passed by Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Room No.17, District Sultanpur, in Crl. Case No. 1945/2025, arises out of Case Crime No. 504 of 2024, U/s- 3(5), 115(2), 351(3), 352, 324(4), 117(2), 110 BNS Police Station-Kotwali Dehat, District-Sultanpur, contained as Annexure Nos. 1, to this petition; ii. quash the entire criminal proceedings arises out of impugned Charge Sheet No. 01/2025, filed on 05.03.2025, in Case Crime No. 504 of 2024, U/s- 3(5), 115(2), 351(3), 352, 324(4), 117(2), 110 BNS Police Station-Kotwali Dehat, District- Sultanpur, contained as Annexure No. 2, to this petition. iii. Stay the further proceedings of Crl. Case No. 1945/2025, State Vs Rajeev Kumar @ Ajay Devgan and others, arises out of Case Crime No. 504 of 2024, U/s-3(5), 115(2), 351(3), 352, 324(4), 117(2), 110 BNS, Police Station-Kotwali Dehat, District- Sultanpur, pending in the Court of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Room No.17, District Sultanpur against petitioners." 3. Learned counsel for the applicants submits that the applicants are innocent and they have falsely been implicated in the present case with false and frivolous allegations. He further added that the applicants were not involved in committing the alleged offence as has been mentioned in the first information report. 4. At this stage, learned counsel for the applicants submits that he does not want to press the application and seeks liberty to file bail application before the learned trial court which may be decided in view of law laid by Hon'ble Supreme Court's judgment in the case of Satender Kumar Antil versus Central Bureau of Investigation and another (2022)10 SCC 51. 5. Learned A.G.A. has no objection to the prayer made by learned counsel for the applicants. 6. On due consideration to the submissions of learned counsel for the parties, it is provided that in case, the applicants appear before the trial court within two weeks from today and file bail application, the same shall be decided expeditiously in view of law laid down in the case of Satender Kumar Antil (supra). 7. The application is disposed of accordingly. Order Date :- 18.8.2025 Mohd. Sharif Digitally signed by :- MOHAMMAD SHARIF High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- MOHAMMAD SHARIF High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench