Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 158187 (ALL)

SHESHDHAR JAISAWAL v. CONSOLIDATION OFFICER, BHINGA/ RULE 109, SHRAWASTI AND ANOTHER

A227/4895/2025 · 2025-08-18

Alok Mathur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:48141 Court No. - 5 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 4895 of 2025 Petitioner :- Sheshdhar Jaisawal Respondent :- Consolidation Officer, Bhinga/ Rule 109, Shrawasti And Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Amitesh Pratap Singh,Gyanendra Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Alok Mathur,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the State respondent no.1. 2. In light of the proposed order, notice to private respondent no.2 is dispensed with. 3. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioner praying for direction to the respondent No. 1 / Consolidation Officer, Bhinga, District Shrawasti, to decide the Application under Rule 109A (2) U.P. Consolidation of Holdings Act dated 04.03.2025, "Chhedi vs. Kamta Prasad" for Amal Daramad of final order dated 24.02.2025 passed by DDC, Shrawasti in Case No.0020 of 2021, expeditiously. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance of the petitioner would be sufficiently met in case respondent no. 1 / Consolidation Officer, Bhinga, District Shrawasti, considers and decides the aforesaid application in the time bound manner. 5. At this stage, this Court is not inclined to interfere in the matter under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. However, liberty is granted to the petitioner to approach the court/ authority concerned and move an appropriate application detailing urgency for expeditious disposal of the Application under Rule 109A (2) U.P. Consolidation of Holdings Act dated 04.03.2025, "Chhedi vs. Kamta Prasad" for Amal Daramad of final order dated 24.02.2025 passed by DDC, Shrawasti in Case No.0020 of 2021, along with the order passed by this Court, within two weeks from today, and in case, if such an application is moved, the court/authority shall consider and decide the same within three weeks thereafter, and in case, any case for urgency is made out by the petitioners, it shall pass appropriate orders thereupon, and proceed in accordance with law. 6. It is made clear that this Court has not examined the case of either of the parties on merit and the court/authority concerned shall decide the matter strictly in accordance with law. 7. With above observations, the writ petition is disposed of. [Alok Mathur,J.] Order Date :- 18.8.2025 KR Digitally signed by :- RABINDRA KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench