ABDUL HAQUE ALIAS RABUL HASSAN v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
A.B.A./3558/2024 · 2025-03-07
Anil Kumar Choudhary
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 15818 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 15818 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
A.B.A. No.3558 of 2024
------ Abdul Haque @ Adbul Haque @ Rabul Hassan, aged about 49 years, son of Late Shekh Ali Hassan, Resident of Village-Tabar, P.O. & P.S.- Satbarwa, Dist.-Palamau, Jharkhand.
.... .... …. Petitioner
Versus
The State of Jharkhand
.... .... .... Opposite Party
------
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
------
For the Petitioner : Mr. Niranjan Kr. Sinha, Advocate
For the State
: Mr. Nawin Kr. Singh, Addl.P.P.
------
Order No.05 Dated- 07/03/2025
Heard the parties.
Apprehending his arrest in connection with Satbarwa P.S. Case No.04 of 2024 instituted for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 325, 307, 354, 504, 506/34 of Indian Penal Code, the petitioner has moved this Court for grant of privileges of anticipatory bail.
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner in furtherance of common intention with the co-accused person attempted to murder the Devar of the informant namely Kazim Ansari and her husband Chand Mohammad. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is next submitted that the petitioner has stated to have assaulted Chand Mohammad and the alleged injury sustained by him is simple in nature. It is next submitted that the genesis of the occurrence is attempt of the informant and her husband to grab the land of the petitioner by forcibly constructing toilet over the land of the petitioner. It is next submitted that the petitioner has no intention to kill anybody. It is then submitted that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent as has been mentioned in para-12 of this anticipatory bail application. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner undertakes to co- operate with the investigation of the case and to furnish sufficient security including cash security. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be given the privileges of anticipatory bail.
Learned Addl. P.P appearing for the State opposes the prayer for
anticipatory bail of the petitioner.
Considering the submissions of learned counsels and the facts and circumstances stated above, I am inclined to grant privileges of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to surrender in the Court below within six weeks from today and in the event of his arrest or surrendering, he will be enlarged on bail on depositing Rs.20,000/- as cash security and on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M., Palamau at Daltonganj in connection with Satbarwa P.S. Case No.04 of 2024 with the condition that he will co-operate with the investigation of the case and appear before the investigating officer as and when noticed by him and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the pendency of the case and further conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Abhiraj/