HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 7628 of 2025 Court No. - 9 HON'BLE RAJESH SINGH CHAUHAN, J. HON'BLE SYED QAMAR HASAN RIZVI, J. 1. Heard Sri Uma Kant Gupta, learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri G.D. Bhatt, learned AGA for the State-opposite parties. 2. In view of the order proposed to be passed, notice to opposite party no. 4 is dispensed with. 3. By means of this writ petition, the petitioners have assailed the following relief:- "(a) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the opposite parties no. 2 and 3 not to arrest or adopt any coercive measures against the petitioners, as contained in Annexure No. 1 to this writ petition, so far it relates to the petitioner." 4. Sri G.D. Bhatt, learned A.G.A. has produced the instructions letter dated 12.09.2025 provided by one Suraj Singh, Sub Inspector, Police Station Bighapur, District Unnao, addressing to the Government Advocate of this Court, the same is taken on record. 5. As per the aforesaid instructions, no FIR has been lodged against the petitioner no. 1 and she is not required for the purpose of interrogation also, so the petitioner no. 1 has wrongly filed the present writ petition. So far as the petitioner no. 2 is concerned, since the daughter of the respondent no. 4 is missing and the allegation is that the son of petitioner no. 2 has eloped the daughter of the respondent no. 4, therefore, for the purpose of interrogation, he has been called. The location of the missing girl has not been traced out as yet. 6. Having considered the submissions of learned counsel for the parties and Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Uma Kant Gupta Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. Ram Kali And Another .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) the instructions so filed, we find that the prayer prayed in the present writ petition is misconceived, in as much as the daughter of the respondent no. 4 is missing and the allegation is that the son of petitioner no. 2 has eloped her, thus the proper investigation is required in the matter, for that, the petitioner no. 2 shall cooperate properly. At the same time, it is also expected from the Investigating Agency that the petitioner no. 2 may not be unnecessarily harassed and if he cooperates properly, his statement etc. may be recorded and relevant material/credible evidence may be collected. All efforts may be taken by the Investigating Agency to trace out the location of the daughter of the respondent no. 4. 7. The present writ petition is disposed of in terms of the aforesaid. 8. Consigned to the records. September 15, 2025 Arun CRLP No. 7628 of 2025 2 (Syed Qamar Hasan Rizvi,J.) (Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J.) Digitally signed by :- ARUN KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench