Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 158160 (ALL)

AJAY KUMAR MAURYA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO. AND ANOTHER

A482/6703/2025 · 2025-08-20

Shree Prakash Singh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:48781 Court No. - 14 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 6703 of 2025 Applicant :- Ajay Kumar Maurya Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Ambika Prasad Mishra,Shraddha Tripathi Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Shree Prakash Singh,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. 2. Instant application under Section 482 Cr.P.C./ 528 B.N.S.S. has been filed with the following relief:- "That for the facts reasons and circumstances stated in the accompanying affidavit, it is most respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble court may kindly be pleased to allow this petition and quash the impugned chargesheet bearing No. 152 of 2018 dated 10-07-2018 filed in case crime No. 191 of 2018 U/s-292 I.P.C. at Police Station-Amethi, District- Amethi, so for it relates to the petitioner contained as Annexure No.1 to this petition and summoning order/cognizance order dated 03-10-2019 as well as wailable warrant dated 22-05-2025 passed by Village Court Amethi in criminal Case No. 894 of 2024 in the name of State Vs Ajay Kumar Maurya arising out of case crime No.191 of 2018, U/s- 292 I.P.C. at Police Station-Amethi which is contained as Annexure No.2 to this pet…" 3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant is innocent and he has falsely been implicated in the present case with false and frivolous allegations. He further added that the applicant is not involved in committing the alleged offence as has been mentioned in the first information report. 4. At this stage, learned counsel for the applicant submits that he does not want to press the application and seeks liberty to file bail application before the learned trial court which may be decided in view of law laid by Hon'ble Supreme Court's judgment in the case of Satender Kumar Antil versus Central Bureau of Investigation and another (2022)10 SCC 51. 5. Learned A.G.A. has no objection to the prayer made by learned counsel for the applicant. 6. On due consideration to the submissions of learned counsel for the parties, it is provided that in case, the applicant appears before the trial court within two weeks from today and files bail application, the same shall be decided expeditiously in view of law laid down in the case of Satender Kumar Antil (supra). 7. Further, the applicant will have an opportunity at the appropriate stage to move an application for discharge taking therein all the pleas factual and legal which may be available to them, in accordance with law. In case, such an application is moved before the learned trial court, the learned trial court shall dispose of the same by a speaking and reasoned order strictly, in accordance with law. 8. The application is disposed of accordingly. Order Date :- 20.8.2025 Mohd. Sharif Digitally signed by :- MOHAMMAD SHARIF High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench