Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 158158 (ALL)

NANDLAL v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. REVENUE DEPTT., LKO. AND OTHERS

A227/4903/2025 · 2025-08-18

Alok Mathur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:48150 Court No. - 5 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 4903 of 2025 Petitioner :- Nandlal Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue Deptt., Lko. And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Jnanendra Pratap Shukla Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Mohan Singh Hon'ble Alok Mathur,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents no.1 to 3. 2. In light of the proposed order, notice to private respondents is dispensed with. 3. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioner praying for direction to the respondent No. 2 / Additional Commissioner (Judicial), Ayodhya Division, Ayodhya to decide the Case No.2280 of 2024 (Computerized Case No.C202404000002280) "Manoj Kumar and another vs. Sitaram and others, under Section 333 of U.P.Z.A. and L.R. Act, which is pendng before the respondent no.2, expeditiously. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that grievance of the petitioners would be sufficiently met in case respondent no. 2 / Additional Commissioner (Judicial), Ayodhya Division, Ayodhya considers and decides the aforesaid case in the time bound manner. 5. At this stage, this Court is not inclined to interfere in the matter under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. However, liberty is granted to the petitioners to approach the court/ authority concerned and move an appropriate application detailing urgency for expeditious disposal of the Case No.2280 of 2024 (Computerized Case No.C202404000002280) "Manoj Kumar and another vs. Sitaram and others, under Section 333 of U.P.Z.A. and L.R. Act, along with the order passed by this Court, within two weeks from today, and in case, if such an application is moved, the court/authority shall consider and decide the same within three weeks thereafter, and in case, any case for urgency is made out by the petitioners, it shall pass appropriate orders thereupon, and proceed in accordance with law. 6. It is made clear that this Court has not examined the case of either of the parties on merit and the court/authority concerned shall decide the matter strictly in accordance with law. 7. With above observations, the writ petition is disposed of. [Alok Mathur,J.] Order Date :- 18.8.2025 KR Digitally signed by :- RABINDRA KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench