JAYANTI SAHU AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO. AND 4 OTHERS
A482/6701/2025 · 2025-08-20
Shree Prakash Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 158154 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 158154 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:48788
Court No. - 14 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 6701 of 2025 Applicant :- Jayanti Sahu And Another Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. And 4 Others Counsel for Applicant :- Rajendra Kumar Rajbhar,Vijay Kumar Jaiswal,Vinod Kumar Maurya Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Shree Prakash Singh,J. Supplementary Affidavit filed on behalf of the applicants is taken on record. Heard learned counsel for the applicants, learned AGA for the State and perused the record. Instant application under Section 482 Cr.P.C./528 of the B.N.S.S.,2023, has been filed with the prayer to quash the summoning order dated 07- 10-2022 passed in Criminal Case No. 91311 of 2022, in Case Crime No. 90 of 2021, under sections 323, 504, 506 of the I.P.C., by Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Room No. 27, Lucknow and the chargesheet dated 05-03-2021 by means of which the charges u/s 323,504,506 of the I.P.C. have been framed against the applicants.
Learned counsel appearing for the applicants submits that the applicants are innocent and were never involved in committing the offence as has been mentioned in the first information report. He added that due to enmity, their names have been planted in the first information report and thereafter they have been chargesheeted. He next added that due to unavoidable circumstances, they could not appear before the court below. At this stage, learned counsel for the applicants submits that he does not want to press the application and seeks liberty to file bail application before the learned trial court which may be decided in view of law laid by Hon'ble Supreme Court's judgment in the case of Satender Kumar Antil versus Central Bureau of Investigation
and another (2022)10 SCC 51. Learned A.G.A. has no objection to the prayer made by learned counsel for the applicants. On due consideration to the submissions of
learned counsel for the parties', it is provided that in case, the applicants appear before the trial court within two weeks from today and file bail application, the same shall be decided expeditiously in view of law laid down in the case of Satender Kumar Antil (supra). Further, the applicants will have an opportunity at the appropriate stage to move an application for discharge taking therein all the pleas factual and legal which may be available to them, in accordance with law. In case, such an application is moved before the learned trial court, the learned trial court shall dispose of the same by a speaking and reasoned order strictly, in accordance with law. The application is disposed of accordingly.
Order Date :- 20.8.2025 AKS Digitally signed by :- ANUJ KRISHNA SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- ANUJ KRISHNA SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench