MITHILESH KUMARI v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY., REVENUE DEPTT., LKO. AND OTHERS
A227/4944/2025 · 2025-08-21
Alok Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 158128 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 158128 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:49038 Court No. - 5 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 4944 of 2025 Petitioner :- Mithilesh Kumari Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy., Revenue Deptt., Lko. And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Sudhir Kumar Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Alok Mathur,J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents.
2. In view of the order proposed to be passed, requirement of issuance of notice to private respondents are hereby dispensed with.
3. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioner praying for direction to the respondent No. 2 to decide the case of petitioner along with application for restoration pending before him in Case No. T202404040305686 (Mithhilesh Kumari Vs. Radhika Prasad & others) arising out of Original Case No. 121/2023, Computerized Case No. T202304040300121 (Mithilesh Kumar Vs. Radhika Prasad & others) U/S 24 of Land Revenue Code, 2006 expeditiously.
4. After arguing the matter at some lengths, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance of the petitioner would be sufficiently met in case respondent no. 2 considers and decides the restoration application aforesaid case in the time bound manner.
5. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the aforesaid prayer.
6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without entering into the merits, respondent no. 2 - Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Tehsil - Tanda, District - Ambedkar Nagar is
directed to decide application for restoration pending before him in Case No. T202404040305686 (Mithhilesh Kumari Vs. Radhika Prasad & others) arising out of Original Case No. 121/2023, Computerized Case No. T202304040300121 (Mithilesh Kumar Vs. Radhika Prasad & others) U/S 24 of Land Revenue Code, 2006, expeditiously, say within a period of four months from the date of production of certified copy of
this order, in accordance with law, if there is no legal impediment.
7. It is further directed that the parties to the case shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case and shall not seek any unnecessary adjournment, neither any such adjournment shall be granted by the Court concerned, except in exceptional circumstances.
8. With above observations/directions, the writ petition stands
disposed of. (Alok Mathur, J.)
Order Date :- 21.8.2025 Ravi/ Digitally signed by :- RAVI SHANKAR SRIVASTAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench