IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 119 CR-6641-2017 (O & M) Date of Decision:25.03.2025 KARNAIL SINGH ...PETITIONER VERSUS SANTOKH SINGH AND ANR ...RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUVIR SEHGAL Present: Mr. Lakhwinder Singh Mann, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Rajesh Punj, Advocate, Mr. Sahaj Punj, Advocate & Ms. Manvi Singla, Advocate for respondent No.1. Mr. Nitin Sharma, Advocate for Mr. Ramesh Sharma, Advocate for respondent No.2. *** SUVIR SEHGAL, J.(ORAL) 1. At the outset, Mr. Mann submits that petitioner has expired and he is not in touch with his legal representatives. 2. This petition is pending before this Court since the year 2017 and by order dated 27.09.2017, further proceedings before the Trial Court were adjourned beyond the date fixed by this Court. It seems that the petitioner or his legal heirs are not interested in pursuing the petition. 3. Dismissed for default in prosecution. However, liberty is granted to the petitioner/his LRs to seek revival of the petition, in case, they intend to pursue the litigation. 4. Pending application(s) is/are disposed off. 25.03.2025 (SUVIR SEHGAL) sheetal JUDGE Whether Speaking/Reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No Sheetal 2025.04.02 09:59 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment High Court, Chandigarh