Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010203592025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] TUESDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 4346/2025 Between: Sikha Jyothsna, ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner/accused:
1. RAVI CHANDAVARAPU Counsel for the Respondent/complainant(S):
1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING ORDER:
The petitioner is arraigned as accused in Crime No.49 of 2025, on the file of Duggirala Police Station, Guntur District, for alleged offences under Sections 79, 115(1), 351(3) of B.N.S.
2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Assistant Public Prosecutor.
3. Though the learned counsel for the petitioner filed this petition seeking the quashing of the FIR, he has, however, restricted the relief to the
extent of directing the Investigating Officer to follow the procedure prescribed under Section 35(3) of the BNSS, and the guidelines prescribed by the Apex Court in Arnesh Kumar v. State of Bihar1.
4. The learned Assistant Public Prosecutor stated that he has no objection to give such a direction.
5. The criminal petition is disposed of by directing the Station House Officer, Duggirala Police Station, Guntur District, to follow the procedure as contemplated under Section 35(3) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short, “BNSS”) in so far as the petitioner is concerned.
As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.
___________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N Date: 22.04.2025 M K K
1 (2014) 8 SCC 273