Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
30.06.2025
SL No.46 Court No.32 S.Gayen IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CRIMINAL REVISIONAL JURISDICTION APPELLATE SIDE
CRR 1113 of 2022
Shyamal Nath Versus The State of West Bengal & Anr.
Mr. Arindam Jana Mr. Akashdeep Mukherjee Mr. Soummyadeep Nag Ms. Soumali Das …for the Opposite Party No.2
1. Learned counsel for the opposite party has submitted that the copy of the revisional application was not supplied. It is also submitted that one notice was served asking for the revisional application along with annexure. Affidavit of service to that effect is filed and taken on record.
2. None appears on behalf of the petitioner. No accommodation has been sought for.
3. It appears that the petitioner is not willing to proceed with this revisional application further.
4. Accordingly, the revisional application stands dismissed for default.
5. Interim order, if any, stands vacated and connected application, if any, also stands dismissed accordingly.
6. Department is directed to intimate the order to the learned Trial Judge for information.
2
7. All parties shall act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court.
(Bibhas Ranjan De, J.)