RAM PRAGAT PANDEY v. DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF CONSOLIDATION, FAIZABAD / AYODHYA AND OTHERS
A227/4886/2025 · 2025-08-18
Alok Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 158070 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 158070 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:48130 Court No. - 5 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 4886 of 2025 Petitioner :- Ram Pragat Pandey Respondent :- Deputy Director Of Consolidation, Faizabad / Ayodhya And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Fakhruddin Ali Ahmad,Rakesh Kumar Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Alok Mathur,J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents.
2. In view of the proposed order, notice to private respondents is dispensed with.
3. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioner praying for direction to the respondent No. 1 / Deputy Director of Consolidation, Faizabad/Ayodhya to decide the restoration application dated 15.07.2024 filed in Revision No.1688 of 2019, under Section 48(1) of U.P.C.H. Act,
"Ram Pragat Pandey vs. State of U.P. and others" which is pending since 15.07.2024, expeditiously.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance of the petitioner would be sufficiently met in case respondent no. 1/ Deputy Director of Consolidation, Faizabad/Ayodhya, considers and decides the aforesaid restoration application in the time bound manner.
5. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the aforesaid prayer.
6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without entering into the merits, respondent no. 1/ Deputy Director of Consolidation, Faizabad/Ayodhya is directed to decide the restoration application dated 15.07.2024 filed in Revision No.1688 of 2019, under Section 48(1) of U.P.C.H. Act, "Ram Pragat Pandey vs. State of U.P. and others", expeditiously, say within a period of three months from the date of production of certified copy of this order, in accordance with law, if there is no legal impediment.
7. It is further directed that the parties to the case shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case and shall not seek any unnecessary adjournment, neither any such adjournment shall be granted by the Court concerned, except in exceptional circumstances.
8. With above observations/directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. [Alok Mathur,J.] Order Date :- 18.8.2025 KR Digitally signed by :- RABINDRA KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench