Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 15807 (RAJ)

BHOMARAM S/O SHYAMARAM v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/5257/2025 · 2025-05-14

Pramil Kumar Mathur

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:20364] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 5256/2025 Indrajeet Singh S/o Guruvindra Singh, R/o House No. E-5, New Ganesh Nagar, Rama Mandi, Police Station Rama Mandi, District Jalandhar Punjab. (Presently The Accused Is In Judicial Custody In Central Jaipur). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 5257/2025 Bhomaram S/o Shyamaram, Aged About 27 Years, R/o First Tanki Shergarh, Police Station Shergarh, District Jaipur Rural. (Presently The Accused Is In Judicial Custody In Central Jaipur). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Manish Gupta For Respondent(s) : Mr. Naresh Kumar Gupta, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR Order 14/05/2025 1. The petitioners have preferred these bail applications under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.0055/2024 registered at Police Station-Sarund, District-Kotputli-Behrod for offences under Sections 457 and 380 of IPC. 2. Since both the bail applications arise out of common FIR, therefore these cases are being decided by a single order. 3. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the [2025:RJ-JP:20364] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-5256/2025] petitioners have falsely been implicated in these cases. He submits that another co-accused-Bhagwati Lal @ Baggu has already been enlarged on bail by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court 21.05.2024. The petitioner-Indrajeet Singh is behind the Bar since 06.03.2024 and the petitioner-Bhomaram is behind the Bar since 20.06.2024. The trial of the case may take considerable time, hence the bail applications of the petitioners may be allowed. 5. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail applications. 6. On consideration of the rival submission and material available on record and deliberating all the facts and circumstances of the case and without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioners. 7. Accordingly, the bail applications under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is ordered that the petitioners- (1) Indrajeet Singh S/o Guruvindra Singh (2) Bhomaram S/o Shyamaram shall be released on bail on their furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court for their appearance before that Court on all the dates till conclusion of the trial. (PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J Anil Sharma/168-169