JHINNU LAL AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF HOME LKO. AND 4 OTHERS
WRIC/7916/2025 · 2025-08-21
Brij Raj Singh, Sangeeta Chandra
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 158068 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 158068 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:49122-DB Court No. - 2 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 7916 of 2025 Petitioner :- Jhinnu Lal And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Home Lko. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Pradeep Kumar Shukla,Manoj Kumar Nishad Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Mohan Singh Hon'ble Mrs. Sangeeta Chandra,J. Hon'ble Brij Raj Singh,J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for the State Respondents and Sri Mohan Singh, learned counsel appearing for the Gram Sabha.
2. This writ petition has been filed with the following main prayers:-
"I. A writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the opposite party no.2/District Magistrate, Ambedkar Nagar to decide the matter remanded back to the District Magistrate Ambedkar Nagar of order dated 09.08.2018 passed by this Hon'ble Court in case- MISC.SINGLE NO:-5166 of 2004, titled as Sobh Nath Versus State OF U.P. & Others, contained as Annexure No.1 within specific time frame preferably within three months. II. A writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus thereby directing to the opposite parties no. 4 & 5 / private opposite parties to maintain the status quo till the disposal of the matter remanded back to the District Magistrate of
order dated 09.08.2018 passed by this Hon'ble Court in case- MISC.SINGLE NO:-5166 of 2004, titled as Sobh Nath Versus State OF U.P. & Others, contained as Annexure No.1. III. A writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus thereby directing the opposite party no.2/District Magistrate, Ambedkar Nagar to decide the representation dated 24.03.2025 within stipulated time by a reasoned & speaking order as contained in Annexure No.8 to this writ petition."
3. We have gone through the order dated 09.08.2018 passed by this Court in Writ Petition No. 5166(MS) of
2004. The petitioner has remedy of filing a Contempt Petition in case he is convinced that the order dated 09.08.2018 has not been complied with by the Competent Authority.
4. Accordingly, this writ petition stands disposed of.
Order Date :- 21.8.2025 Darpan Sharma Digitally signed by :- DARPAN SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench