Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 158066 (ALL)

DR. VINAY KUMAR MISRA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. AYUSH LKO. AND 4 OTHERS

WRIA/9181/2025 · 2025-08-18

Manish Mathur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:48016 Court No. - 8 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 9181 of 2025 Petitioner :- Dr. Vinay Kumar Misra Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Ayush Lko. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Dinesh Kumar Shukla Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Manish Mathur,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned State Counsel appearing on behalf of opposite parties. 2. Petition has been filed seeking a direction to the opposite parties for payment of third A.C.P. and for consequential effect on petitioner' salary and pensionary benefits. 3. For the aforesaid grievance, the petitioner has already submitted a representation but seeks liberty to file a fresh representation before the authority concerned. 4. Considering innocuous prayer being made by learned counsel for the petitioner and without entering into the merits of the case petitioner is granted liberty to file a fresh representation before opposite party No. 2 i.e. Director, Ayurvedic Services, Uttar Pradesh, Lucknow. In case such a representation is filed, the same shall be decided by a reasoned and speaking order within with period of eight weeks from the date a copy of this order is produced before the said authority. 5. With the aforesaid observations, the writ petition stands disposed of. Order Date :- 18.8.2025 Shahnaz Digitally signed by :- SHAHNAZ BANO High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench